Police did not only move Sheila's hand, to photograph marks on Nightdress...

[mike tesko]

What does this tell us, in so far as the existence of the other photograph?

[mike tesko]

It tells us that there was another camera being used at the scene, with use of a different negative strip...

[mike tesko]

It tells us that there was another  being used at the scene, with use of a different negative strip...

So why were police using two different cameras at the scene, involving different negative strips, to record Sheila's body with the gun upon it?

[tonyb]

Mike,Looking at the finger "marks" at the wound site. It looks to me as though after shot the head "lolled forward and then the neck skin sealed the hole.that would give you that type of mark. The head moves back and the blood leaks from the open wound. ? what do you think ?

[mike tesko]

So why were police using two different  at the scene, involving different negative strips, to record Sheila's body with the gun upon it?

There must have been two , and two negative strips, recording Sheila's body on the floor, and both of these negative strips need to be looked at very closely? I would be interested to know which negative strip each of the three pictures subject of this thread, were given? Which of these negative strips has got the missing 8 photographs on it, and which has not?

[tonyb]

Plus,I would imagine that wound site,is the non fatal shot? am i correct?

[mike tesko]

Mike,Looking at the finger "marks" at the wound site. It looks to me as though after shot the head "lolled forward and then the neck skin sealed the hole.that would give you that type of mark. The head moves back and the blood leaks from the open wound. ? what do you think ?

I am with you...

[tonyb]

So,non fatal wound,head lolls forward and seals wound,recovers consciousness and raises head ,leaks blood.

[tonyb]

finds the rifle between herself and June,slips off the bed....Boom,fatal shot. Perhaps the police were already on scene,already had a quick look round,after all,head wound,she's dead,dont touch anything till SOCO get here ..... BANG.... oh shit.....

[mike tesko]

So,non fatal wound,head lolls forward and seals wound,recovers consciousness and raises head ,leaks blood.

Which leaks vertically, not horizontally, in my opinion...

ask yourself this question - why is there a dried trail of blood that seemingly runs vertically away from the lower entry wound, and a wet flow of blood which appears to run horizontally away from the same no  entry wound?

To me, I don't think what appears to be wet blood blood running from the lower non fatal entry wound, is blood that originates from that wound, I think it is blood which got transferred from the upper fatal entry wound after the fatal shot got inflicted with the head lolling forward,than backwards, so that blood appears to run horizontally from both entry wounds?

[mike tesko]

I hope I have explained the point I have been trying tio make, basically, there appears to be two trails of blood leading away from the lower entry wound, one which runs vertically and which has dried, and the other horizontally which is wet looking...

[tonyb]

I hope I have explained the point I have been trying tio make, basically, there appears to be two trails of blood leading away from the lower entry wound, one which runs vertically and which has dried, and the other horizontally which is wet looking...

Mike I can see where your coming from but is it proved that the wound you refer to is the non fatal shot?

[mike tesko]

Mike I can see where your coming from but is it proved that the wound you refer to is the non fatal shot?

Only by reference to the autopsy report, and evidence of the pathologist - references made by him about the bullet fragmenting and that Sheila would not have died instantaneously, but that she could have eventually bled to death...

[tonyb]

Only by reference to the autopsy report, and evidence of the pathologist - references made by him about the bullet fragmenting and that Sheila would not have died instantaneously, but that she could have eventually bled to death...

So the wound close to the chin could be a non fatal?

[mike tesko]

So the wound close to the chin could be a non fatal?

Pathologist says death would have followed instantaneously once the wound under the chin was inflicted, but I suppose it could be possible that she might not have died as instantaneously, as he suggests?

So, in those circumstances, what would your point be?