Compilation of Julie Mugford statements, will be posted here later tonight

[mike tesko]

Compilation of Julie Mugford statements, will be posted here later tonight

Witness statement of Julie Mugford, dated, 8th August 1985:-

[mike tesko]

Before I post the next statement in sequence that was supposedly made by Julie Mugford, dated, 8th September 1985, I would like to pose the following question to everyone:-

"WAS THIS STATEMENT MADE IN THE THIRD PERSON"?

If not, where is the original statement that Mugford made when she made her first statement to the police after Jeremy effectively "dumped her"?

[mike tesko]

Readers should also be aware that no fingerprinting at the scene took place, until after the nature of the police investigation changed, on 7th September 1985...

[mike tesko]

OK...

Mugford is lying because there was no fingerprint examination at the scene until after 7th September 1985...

Now...

If this is not true, please direct me to any information or source which suggests that there was any fingerprint examination at the scene, by 12th August 1985?

Julie Mugford, is basically a pathological liar...

[mike tesko]

What we are dealing with here, is Mugford making a statement on 8th September 1985, at the time police had undertaken a fingerprint search of the premises, so somebody was feeding her information to put into her statement, which was not necessarily true in the grand sequence of events...

[mike tesko]

I am not yet convinced that the contents of her first statement (8th September 1985) were written in the third person, as suggested by some other police documentation?

[mike tesko]

If not...

Where is the original statement that was allegedly made in the third person?

[mike tesko]

Witness statement of Julie Mugford, dated, 8th September 1985:-

[mike tesko]

I am preparing to post the next statement in sequence, purportedly made by Julie Mugford, dated, 10th September 1985, consisting of 24 pages...

[mike tesko]

It was in this statement that Julie Mugford stated that Jeremy had paid £2000 to Matthew for him to shoot dead his family...

[mike tesko]

Witness statement of Julie Mugford, dated, 10th September 1985:-

[mike tesko]

Two more statements to post, one dated, 23rd September 1985, and the other, dated, 14th October 1985...

I will post these tomorrow evening...

[Chochokeira]

OK...

Mugford is lying because there was no fingerprint examination at the scene until after 7th September 1985...

Now...

If this is not true, please direct me to any information or source which suggests that there was any fingerprint examination at the scene, by 12th August 1985?

Julie Mugford, is basically a pathological liar...

good point, Mike.

"I told him that I couldn't take the pretence any longer in connection with Colin and wanted to go out. What annoyed me was that Colin was showing Jeremy so much love and affection and I felt that because of what happened that Jeremy had had Colin's children killed he was abusing Colin's good nature. In the pizza bar I again got upset and told Jeremy that he wasn't being fair to everyone and he then said he had done it because he felt there was a valid reason for doing it."

What annoyed her???

Abusing Colin's good nature???

Jeremy wasn't fair to everyone???

Why does JM use mild, mundane, emotionless expressions when allegedly describing her feelings about the man she loves and who she is sleeping with having organised the murder of two little children?

JM speaks of her claim that Jeremy arranged a bloody massacre with less emotion than most of us would use to describe dissatisfaction with, say, the service in a restaurant.

Why is there not a fragment of emotion or feeling in this appallingly cold hearted account?

Because what JM describes just did not happen?

[sc82]

Her statements have always seemed very cliche - "tonight's the night" for example.  After it was discovered that the man she named as the hitman was not involved, did the police question her further regarding that or did they just take that to be another lie from Jeremy?

[Buddy]

So we can now add to JMs CV, Drug user, Drug dealer, and Drug runner.
She should have been charged.
Her statements looked like someone else had wrote them [Jones], and she signed them. Then had the coaching lessons.
The fact that this women is now a head teacher is appalling.