« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Hand print on Sheila  (Read 1162 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline monkeytrafford8

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Hand print on Sheila
« on: November 08, 2011, 06:26:PM »
It has been claimed that there was no blood on sheila's hands. The reason why the body was moved at some point in the photographs being taken was to see a bloody hand print on her dress.

Clearly if is this a hand print in her blood and she had no blood on her hands then she must have murdered.

Logged

Offline monkeytrafford8

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Hand print on Sheila
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2011, 06:28:PM »
Sorry, must have been murdered.

Also, I'm referring to the photo on the right.
Logged

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Hand print on Sheila
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2011, 08:06:PM »
Normally photographs of a suspected killer or a victims hands are photographed front and back...so why do they claim no photograph was taken.
It is my view her hand was in fact bloodied.
Logged

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Hand print on Sheila
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2011, 09:24:AM »
If the hands and feet were clean as stated they would have shown that in evidence.
As it is we are supposed to trust the claims of people who are proven liars or have had false statements made in their names.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »