Question for Mike Tesko

[OnceSaid]

So you don't actually believe everything you publish? Just to encourage debate?

It makes no difference what MT thinks or believes.  He is posting as much information as he possibly can that was not available at the trial or was not in the public domain for many years, this gives the reader the opportunity to learn more about the murders at WHF, the investigation and the trial.  He also gives his opinion on various aspects of the case, however people will make up their own minds about the case and whether JB is innocent or guilty.

MT should be applauded for the amount of time he works on this case.  I have learned so much from this forum, that it encourages me to continue reading, and retains my interest.  Debate is good.

[jackiepreece]

Vidvic you are saying he didn't love his family

Your assumption is based on what you have been told  am I correct

I have asked no question about theft

Vidvic do you also accept Jeremy had never shown any signs of violence

[vidvic]

No. It is based on the fact they are dead.

You might have noticed from the photos that they were violently killed, in cold blood.

I note your avoidance of the theft issue as irrelevant, though Julie Mugford's theft issue is a capitol offence.

[clifford]

No. It is based on the fact they are dead.

You might have noticed from the photos that they were violently killed, in cold blood.

I note your avoidance of the theft issue as irrelevant, though Julie Mugford's theft issue is a capitol offence.

Vic JM was already a thief, so who influenced who?

[vidvic]

I agree Cliff. Believe me, I am no fan of Julie Mugford. Just pointing out the hypocrisy.

[grahameb]

Vidvic do you agree Jeremy loved his family

Yes - he loved them so much he stole from them.

Wonder if eaton has the same i,p addy as Tonker??

I haven't got the time to keep reminding these jokers about their bad manners. I've deleted him.

[jackiepreece]

Vidvic we are all on this forum to discuss a case that is with the CCrc to see if it will be sent to the court of appeal.

Once again you have no evidence to support the fact you have been fed by the relatives who benefited hugely from this crime.

There is absolutely no evidence that Jeremy did not love his family and Jeremy was only convicted on circumstantial evidence.

Stop accusing Mike of stuff when you do far worse.

Anne Eaton makes herself sound evil with comments like in nannys bedroom there were no photos of Jeremy.
I think she added I think there were no pictures of Jeremy.

Read Anne Eatons statements I don't need to try and persuade people she is evil she does it very well herself.

You can continue with your propaganda on the forum about Jeremy but the argument has no weight behind it because bit by bit the truth is coming out like the disgraceful crime scene photos of the police horsing about.

It's funny much has been made about Jeremys demeanour after the murders let's have a discussion on the policemans demeanour after the murder

Surely they would be traumatised but no we now have pictures of them posing as the scence of the murders

I hope they land on the front page of every newspaper one

[grahameb]

Vidvic we are all on this forum to discuss a case that is with the CCrc to see if it will be sent to the court of appeal.

Once again you have no evidence to support the fact you have been fed by the relatives who benefited hugely from this crime.

There is absolutely no evidence that Jeremy did not love his family and Jeremy was only convicted on circumstantial evidence.

Stop accusing Mike of stuff when you do far worse.

Anne Eaton makes herself sound evil with comments like in nannys bedroom there were no photos of Jeremy.
I think she added I think there were no pictures of Jeremy.

Read Anne Eatons statements I don't need to try and persuade people she is evil she does it very well herself.

You can continue with your propaganda on the forum about Jeremy but the argument has no weight behind it because bit by bit the truth is coming out like the disgraceful crime scene photos of the police horsing about.

It's funny much has been made about Jeremys demeanour after the murders let's have a discussion on the policemans demeanour after the murder

Surely they would be traumatised but no we now have pictures of them posing as the scence of the murders

I hope they land on the front page of every newspaper one

Oh I think a lot of them will be headline news Jackie when Jeremy gets his appeal. And with the help he is getting now I think that will be inevitable.

[jackiepreece]

Grahame I was thinking of the other forum which has a membership of two John and Hartley they could never compete with us because we have Ngb.
John could get 100,000 new members but we wouldn't swap them for our Ngb

We are so lucky on this forum

[grahameb]

Grahame I was thinking of the other forum which has a membership of two John and Hartley they could never compete with us because we have Ngb.
John could get 100,000 new members but we wouldn't swap them for our Ngb

We are so lucky on this forum

Yes I was referring to ngb as well.

[chochokeira]

They [the family] have no voice on here.

Hi Vidvic, from where I'm sitting the extended family appear to have several voices on here. You're one of them 

[jackiepreece]

Grahame get rid of this joker ASAP

They are pathetic

I had the tosser aka David eaton following me on twitter

Earlier today we had eaton

Now we have eaton 2

And petey

No room for fakers on this forum

A lot of grasping at straws at the moment

[chochokeira]

No. It is based on the fact they are dead.

You might have noticed from the photos that they were violently killed, in cold blood.

I note your avoidance of the theft issue as irrelevant, though Julie Mugford's theft issue is a capitol offence.

Vic JM was already a thief, so who influenced who?

Good point, Cliff +1

[chochokeira]

Vidvic we are all on this forum to discuss a case that is with the CCrc to see if it will be sent to the court of appeal.

Once again you have no evidence to support the fact you have been fed by the relatives who benefited hugely from this crime.

There is absolutely no evidence that Jeremy did not love his family and Jeremy was only convicted on circumstantial evidence.

Stop accusing Mike of stuff when you do far worse.

Anne Eaton makes herself sound evil with comments like in nannys bedroom there were no photos of Jeremy.
I think she added I think there were no pictures of Jeremy.

Read Anne Eatons statements I don't need to try and persuade people she is evil she does it very well herself.

You can continue with your propaganda on the forum about Jeremy but the argument has no weight behind it because bit by bit the truth is coming out like the disgraceful crime scene photos of the police horsing about.

It's funny much has been made about Jeremys demeanour after the murders let's have a discussion on the policemans demeanour after the murder

Surely they would be traumatised but no we now have pictures of them posing as the scence of the murders

I hope they land on the front page of every newspaper one

Oh I think a lot of them will be headline news Jackie when Jeremy gets his appeal. And with the help he is getting now I think that will be inevitable.

I think so too.