Author Topic: Silent members.  (Read 31094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kathyann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #60 on: September 14, 2011, 11:09:PM »
Kathyann... did you know that you were a contender for Ann Eaton?   :D
rochford my middle name is ann and i a sure you i aint her :-)

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #61 on: September 14, 2011, 11:12:PM »
Kathyann... did you know that you were a contender for Ann Eaton?   :D
rochford my middle name is ann and i a sure you i aint her :-)

yeah, apologies.  It was me that had you in the sights.  It was only today when I sussed it wasn't you (Via youtube).

Offline shonapugs

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #62 on: September 14, 2011, 11:23:PM »
Any news on jules@mirrorgroup? Deeply dodgy!!

Offline kathyann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #63 on: September 14, 2011, 11:25:PM »
Kathyann... did you know that you were a contender for Ann Eaton?   :D
rochford my middle name is ann and i a sure you i aint her :-)

yeah, apologies.  It was me that had you in the sights.  It was only today when I sussed it wasn't you (Via youtube).
i have now introduced myself through the foyer which i should off done in the first place :-)

Offline bob

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1321
  • 78.6%
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #64 on: September 15, 2011, 12:15:AM »
The last post I made was to ask if you guys were taking part in the mass mailing Freedom Fortnight campaign and as an avid supporter of Jeremy would hate to not be able to pop up and ask similar questions.
I don't mead to be funny, NeBu, but how can anybody be an "avid supporter of Jeremy"?

He's not a football team.

Even his closest advocates on this forum don't actually like him much from what I can tell from recent posts.

Perhaps you could elaborate on the basis of your fandom?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #65 on: September 15, 2011, 12:49:AM »
Hi I've just been reading your comments regarding the issues surrounding silent members and in particular the last post (or one before that) from ngb which applies to me really. I operate an iPad and always have the forum accessible, which probably looks like I'm always lurking in the background 24/7, which is not the case. From my point of view I find the forum fascinating and I love to keep up to date with you guys, I just feel I haven't anything to add to the case and also the in-house fighting has put me off. The last post I made was to ask if you guys were taking part in the mass mailing Freedom Fortnight campaign and as an avid supporter of Jeremy would hate to not be able to pop up and ask similar questions. I appreciate from the mods' point of view it would be annoying if you thought all us silent members were trolls or sitting printing everything off. I assure you this is not why I'm here. I hope I won't be deleted but I understand if you have to to avoid problems. If it helps I am part of the Facebook campaign for Jeremy BAMBER is Innocent and only around 5 members continually keep the site alive (me and 4 others). It's quite strange how this week when we have good news regarding never before seen documents suddenly some members are appearing out of the woodwork. ...........
[/quote
hi im kathy and im the same as nelson im also from the innocent group on facebook, i dont post as i mainly like to read up on latest developments on the forum, i do believe jeremy is innocent, i have been actively involved in the freedom fortnight for jeremy and an avid supporter.

Hi Kathy, interesting post. You've been working hard to help Jeremy, good for you.

Nelsonbu

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #66 on: September 15, 2011, 07:10:AM »
Hi bob, maybe 'avid' was too strong a word, but if I said I have been writing to jb for quite a while and doing a bit of background 'work' on the campaign, and Two of my friends are involved much more than that, and we like him very much, what word do you think I should use?

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #67 on: September 15, 2011, 07:29:AM »
Hi Cliff, nugnug has it about right for me, I'm local and so interested in the case, undecided and more of a reader than a poster.
Hi, DC,
         Welcome.
I understand what you are saying, but you will learn so much more by joining in the discussions.
There must be a lot of things that you are itching to know.
You will find most on here will be friendly to you and answer honestly.
Some are dyed in the wool pro, some anti, and all views respected.
Regards, Cliff.

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #68 on: September 15, 2011, 07:34:AM »
Cliff, are you going to go through the non-posters one by one asking them to post?!  ;D
Not a bad idea HM.
No I don't think so, but I do think that once the ice is broken it will give some more confidence to post.
TBH the last couple of weeks would have put some off.
Perhaps I should be the forum prompter. ;)

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #69 on: September 15, 2011, 08:37:AM »
Any news on jules@mirrorgroup? Deeply dodgy!!
I think she is fake. All mirror personnel have email addresses with .co.uk and never .com.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #70 on: September 15, 2011, 08:39:AM »
The last post I made was to ask if you guys were taking part in the mass mailing Freedom Fortnight campaign and as an avid supporter of Jeremy would hate to not be able to pop up and ask similar questions.
I don't mead to be funny, NeBu, but how can anybody be an "avid supporter of Jeremy"?

He's not a football team.

Even his closest advocates on this forum don't actually like him much from what I can tell from recent posts.

Perhaps you could elaborate on the basis of your fandom?
Perhaps he's a Colchester United supporter? ;D

Steve

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #71 on: September 15, 2011, 09:12:AM »
Nothing wrong with that, they'll be in the Premiership in two years time, and I'm not delusional at all.  ;D

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #72 on: September 15, 2011, 09:23:AM »
Nothing wrong with that, they'll be in the Premiership in two years time, and I'm not delusional at all.  ;D
Your right Steve. ;D

Offline OnceSaid

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #73 on: September 15, 2011, 10:26:AM »
Hello new posters.   :D

clifford

  • Guest
Re: Silent members.
« Reply #74 on: September 15, 2011, 03:33:PM »
It was refreshing that some posters came forward, and I thank you for that.
There is nothing to fear here, and you will be welcomed.
Although we are a pro Bamber site you will find us friendly. Any abuse will be dealt with by the Mods, so come aboard.