Silent members.

[clifford]

a lot of forums have silent members.

Your not one are you nuggy?

[nugnug]

no cliff i would you rather i was lol

[clifford]

no cliff i would you rather i was lol

Not at all nuggy.
I find everyones comments interesting.
Why be a member if you have nothing to add to the debate, unless of course there is another reason.

[nugnug]

well they maybe reading up on the case before posting so they don't look daft when they post or they maybe worried about posting because they don't know the reaction there going to get or weather they will be jumped on bye somebody.

[petey]

This is my 1st post, so I have been silent up to now. I first heard about the case about 10yrs ago during my law degree. My interest was reawakened reading Scott Lomax's book earlier this year, when i did further research and joined the forum. I am here to read and find out more evidence and facts to improve my understanding of the case both from a personal point of view and legal perspective. From what I have read so far I sincerely hope JB is innocent and certainly believe he was denied a fair trial and is at the very least entitled to an appeal. At the moment I am about 70-80% convinced of his innocence.

[clifford]

This is my 1st post, so I have been silent up to now. I first heard about the case about 10yrs ago during my law degree. My interest was reawakened reading Scott Lomax's book earlier this year, when i did further research and joined the forum. I am here to read and find out more evidence and facts to improve my understanding of the case both from a personal point of view and legal perspective. From what I have read so far I sincerely hope JB is innocent and certainly believe he was denied a fair trial and is at the very least entitled to an appeal. At the moment I am about 70-80% convinced of his innocence.

Petey, thankyou for that, and welcome to the forum.
I look forward to you further posts

[clifford]

This is my 1st post, so I have been silent up to now. I first heard about the case about 10yrs ago during my law degree. My interest was reawakened reading Scott Lomax's book earlier this year, when i did further research and joined the forum. I am here to read and find out more evidence and facts to improve my understanding of the case both from a personal point of view and legal perspective. From what I have read so far I sincerely hope JB is innocent and certainly believe he was denied a fair trial and is at the very least entitled to an appeal. At the moment I am about 70-80% convinced of his innocence.

Petey, thankyou for that, and welcome to the forum.
I look forward to you further posts

How about you DCrump?
You have spent nearly three days on here.
You have trawled most posts, what do you think now
You will be treated be with respect I promise whether anti, or pro.

[DCrump]

Hi Cliff, nugnug has it about right for me, I'm local and so interested in the case, undecided and more of a reader than a poster.

[grahameb]

Welcome to the forum Petey and DCrump.

[HMEssex]

Cliff, are you going to go through the non-posters one by one asking them to post?! 

[Nelsonbu]

Hi I've just been reading your comments regarding the issues surrounding silent members and in particular the last post (or one before that) from ngb which applies to me really. I operate an iPad and always have the forum accessible, which probably looks like I'm always lurking in the background 24/7, which is not the case. From my point of view I find the forum fascinating and I love to keep up to date with you guys, I just feel I haven't anything to add to the case and also the in-house fighting has put me off. The last post I made was to ask if you guys were taking part in the mass mailing Freedom Fortnight campaign and as an avid supporter of Jeremy would hate to not be able to pop up and ask similar questions. I appreciate from the mods' point of view it would be annoying if you thought all us silent members were trolls or sitting printing everything off. I assure you this is not why I'm here. I hope I won't be deleted but I understand if you have to to avoid problems. If it helps I am part of the Facebook campaign for Jeremy BAMBER is Innocent and only around 5 members continually keep the site alive (me and 4 others). It's quite strange how this week when we have good news regarding never before seen documents suddenly some members are appearing out of the woodwork. ...........

[Roch]

Hi I've just been reading your comments regarding the issues surrounding silent members and in particular the last post (or one before that) from ngb which applies to me really. I operate an iPad and always have the forum accessible, which probably looks like I'm always lurking in the background 24/7, which is not the case. From my point of view I find the forum fascinating and I love to keep up to date with you guys, I just feel I haven't anything to add to the case and also the in-house fighting has put me off. The last post I made was to ask if you guys were taking part in the mass mailing Freedom Fortnight campaign and as an avid supporter of Jeremy would hate to not be able to pop up and ask similar questions. I appreciate from the mods' point of view it would be annoying if you thought all us silent members were trolls or sitting printing everything off. I assure you this is not why I'm here. I hope I won't be deleted but I understand if you have to to avoid problems. If it helps I am part of the Facebook campaign for Jeremy BAMBER is Innocent and only around 5 members continually keep the site alive (me and 4 others). It's quite strange how this week when we have good news regarding never before seen documents suddenly some members are appearing out of the woodwork. ...........

Good post.  I sometimes pinch stuff from your site.

[HMEssex]

I also think that is a good post, Nelsonbu. 

Regarding members appearing out of the woodwork re good news, do you mean they are trying to put us off/distract?

[chochokeira]

This is my 1st post, so I have been silent up to now. I first heard about the case about 10yrs ago during my law degree. My interest was reawakened reading Scott Lomax's book earlier this year, when i did further research and joined the forum. I am here to read and find out more evidence and facts to improve my understanding of the case both from a personal point of view and legal perspective. From what I have read so far I sincerely hope JB is innocent and certainly believe he was denied a fair trial and is at the very least entitled to an appeal. At the moment I am about 70-80% convinced of his innocence.

Hi Petey, welcome to the the forum. This is a good first post, so I hope you'll post again. I'm reading the Scott Lomax book at present and I'm really enjoying that, though I prefer the Wilkes book because it seems me to be better researched. I totally agree with you, I also believe Jeremy was denied a fair trial and for me that's the number one issue. I feel our justice system and our country has a duty to allow Jeremy a fair Appeal, which can only be achieved with full disclosure of withheld evidence.

[chochokeira]

Hi Cliff, nugnug has it about right for me, I'm local and so interested in the case, undecided and more of a reader than a poster.

Hi DCrump. Welcome to the Jeremy Bamber forum. I've seen your name on here many times. It's good to see a post from you. Hope you post again.