0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
They are in the driving seat. We are passengers in this journey. They must act in the way they see fit. There may be ongoing work to challenge the PSOR which they wish to keep from the public domain. Their necks are on the line so we must accept the crumbs we are fed.
DS Davidson was interviewed for the COLP investigation during 1991. Did he make the sort of comments then that he is making now? If not why not?https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,590.msg12022.html#msg12022
I would urge them to buckle up as I see a fatal collision It smacks of hypocrisy to claim non-disclosure/withholding when JB is doing the same ie the CCRC full statement of reasons from 2011/12.
It is their prerogative. There is no obligation for them to disclose. As previously stated there is no reason to keep us fully briefed on the case. EP has a legal obligation with caveats like national security which does not apply in this case.
May be he can see the way the wind is blowing at this time. I do not know his earlier evidence.
What has surfaced that is going to change the minds of three appeal court judges?
Why do you not have a 'scintilla of doubt Jeremy is innocent' ?You do not believe the CCRC grounds will be successful. Your own grounds had no supporting evidence.
You haven't seen my grounds!
You posted them. They got a PSOR then a full rejection. There was no supporting evidence. If you have new grounds which makes you certain he is innocent, please post them with the new supporting evidence.
Stop being silly. You haven't seen my grounds and the accompanying evidence.
