0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I do genuinely believe Jeremy could be innocent. My views are on this forum Dan.
Although I have only been on this forum for a few years or so. I gather you are on the fence, although I don't recall you saying why. In particular, why are you not a guilter?
ILB, if it is just doubts about Julie, well, even in the absence of her witness testimony, there is the silencer evidence and other people said that he talked about killing his parents.
Dan. I am aware of the silencer. There is Jeremy v Julie. RB is the only person who mentioned he said he could kill his parents. This is a conversation not witnessed by anybody else. Mugford supported Jeremy until he made it clear he didn't want to be with her anymore.
Why don't you take the silencer as proof that it wasn't Sheila?
Because of the suspicious circumstances or it been found by benificaries.
If Sheila had bashed her father, using a bloodied hand, with the silencer, her blood would naturally have been on it. It's the logical way I see it anyway.
Hi Lookout did you see the documentary last night on channel 5?Several experts all agree the two contact shots to Sheila were fired without a silencer attached to the rifle.So the silencer evidence was faked which we always knew anyway.
There were two points about the SM which raise serious questions as to it's authenticity. The first is that AE made notes about blood in the SM before the date the family said it was found. The second was the suggestion by DB that EP took his SM and his subtle suggestion that they may also have taken his fathers who had the same blood type as SC.The pictures showing two records of SM's was also telling.
