Author Topic: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989  (Read 2088 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5953
Re: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989
« Reply #15 on: December 22, 2025, 03:52:PM »
Does he have a Aga Snow  ;D.  No,  how long has he been in now Snow, and when can he apply for Parole again?
He got a minimum of 20yrs in 2005, not sure if its every year or every two years that you can apply for parole, HB!
Would need to check!
No, there are no Aga's in the LM case, HB, just 'alleged' garden fires!
« Last Edit: December 22, 2025, 04:01:PM by snow66! »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989
« Reply #16 on: December 22, 2025, 04:31:PM »
He got a minimum of 20yrs in 2005, not sure if its every year or every two years that you can apply for parole, HB!
Would need to check!
No, there are no Aga's in the LM case, HB, just 'alleged' garden fires!
Thanks Snow, I think with what I’ve read it’s probably every two years for him?  I followed it a bit many years back but not to a great extent, so I’m a bit raw with the case.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989
« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2025, 05:25:PM »
It's one of the great unknowns in this case - with the incentive of possibly leaving prison after 25 years would Bamber have made a confession, expressed remorse and conformed to rehabilitation.
I don't think he would, because money was always in the forefront of his mind. It's why he risked killing five.

I wonder what members and BuboBubo in particular think of the comment made by Lord Lane that there were no drips of June's blood onto Sheila, but were under her on the carpet.

Speaking of Lord Lane, he at least could have got Bamber's age right.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Re: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989
« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2025, 05:30:PM »
He got a minimum of 20yrs in 2005, not sure if its every year or every two years that you can apply for parole, HB!
Would need to check!
No, there are no Aga's in the LM case, HB, just 'alleged' garden fires!

There is a lot of evidence against LM. And the garden fire is not alleged considering LM admitted to it in questioning IIRC.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2025, 05:31:PM by David1819 »

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5953
Re: R v Jeremy Nevill Bamber - Monday, 20th March, 1989
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2025, 05:45:PM »
There is a lot of evidence against LM. And the garden fire is not alleged considering LM admitted to it in questioning IIRC.
Well lets see what his new legal team comes up with, Dave!