What documentation is being withheld which could benefit Jeremy?

[ILB]

The burns were caused between shots 5-8 or after shot 8. This was also after Bamber's brutal kitchen attack. So quite possoble after death.

No reason he would beat Nevill after death.

You can't speak for what a guy would and wouldn't do.

[Steve_uk]

You could be right ILB about Bamber,  FREEDOM BID UK’s longest-serving woman prisoner who knifed love rival could soon be released after 40 years in jail,   She was told she would serve at least 11 years — but is still behind bars after refusing to attend rehabilitation programmes.


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37737514/britains-longest-serving-female-prisoner-released/

She was offered accommodation if authorities could track her, but she turned it down. She's a psychopath, a bully in prison and intimidating presence, having no remorse for the crime she committed, even if it is so long ago.

[snow66!]

There definitely is a marked difference in injuries before and after death, though it's up to a coroner at the post mortem to verify this difference. I think firstly, we're all intelligent enough to realise that a deceased person doesn't bleed, regardless of the depth of injury and a coroner would say at the time which injuries occurred during life and death.
Has there ever been such information put forward regarding inquests ?

The CT say that Nevill was moved from the Aga to the scuttle after entry and his head was cut on the rim and started bleeding again, they say blood stays liquid after death,
What do you make of that claim, Lookout?

[Adam]

You don't have to invent a long conversation just an alternative theory that he spoke to Jeremy Bamber before he received the first four shots.

The defence can't do that at trial. The prosecution will complain to the judge say are inventing things without evidence.

Appreciate 40 years later people do so on social media.

[snow66!]

What did the CCRC said about the previous claim from Bamber that the marks were caused by the heated barrel without the silencer?

I dont really know, Jonathan, you tell me?

[Adam]

You can't speak for what a guy would and wouldn't do.

He couldn't burn Nevill's back before shots 1-4.

Agree he may have hit Nevill more than he needed to in the kitchen attack. Due to being hyped up.

[snow66!]

Snow, ,have you never wondered why you, and others, and the CT, keep making suggestions? I suspect it's because none of you wants to accept JB 's guilt, ergo you all root around in the dark trying to find something which might, possibly, perhaps, maybe, get picked up by someone/anyone and worked on. This far, nothing anyone has found, in 40 years, points to his innocence, whilst much, insisting their words, makes liars out of innocent people.

Clearly, from your last post, Aga burns never entered the consciousness of anyone connected to the case.............and it's taken Boyce, having had one theory rejected, the best part of 40 years to come up with. If such was so obvious, why was that, do you think?

If JB were to confess tomorrow I would just say gee whizz, imagine that, oh well thats that, he was guilty after all!

[Hardy Boy]

The CT say that Nevill was moved from the Aga to the scuttle after entry and his head was cut on the rim and started bleeding again, they say blood stays liquid after death,
What do you make of that claim, Lookout?

The CT can  make any suggestion they want, speculation doesn’t make them Pathology experts. why do you value their opinion so highly Snow?  They’re about as qualified as a Quack doctor.

[ILB]

The defence can't do that at trial. The prosecution will complain to the judge say are inventing things without evidence.

Appreciate 40 years later people do so on social media.

There's no evidence Nevill Bamber recieved four shots before speaking to JB.

There is nothing 40 years on conclusively to dispel or prove he did or didn't recieve a phonecall.

The technology simply didn't exist.

The prosecution " Won't complain to the judge "

[ILB]

He couldn't burn Nevill's back before shots 1-4.

Agree he may have hit Nevill more than he needed to in the kitchen attack. Due to being hyped up.

You can't speak for what a guy may or may do.

Bamber is the one mentioning torture.

[ILB]

This case was different to most because the suspect window was narrowed down to two people. Jeremy or Shelia.

By Jeremy's own narrative he fixed it this way.

[snow66!]

The CT can  make any suggestion they want, speculation doesn’t make them Pathology experts. why do you value their opinion so highly Snow?  They’re about as qualified as a Quack doctor.

Ha ha! Thats why I am contemplating getting in touch with Peter, HB!

[Adam]

You can't speak for what a guy may or may do.

Bamber is the one mentioning torture.

He can't burn Nevill's back before the 4 bed shots. Nevill would over power him.

You can't torture someone who is dead or knocked out.

[Hardy Boy]

Ha ha! Thats why I am contemplating getting in touch with Peter, HB!

Yes good on you, remind him to be quick with his reply in case he kicks the bucket 😂😂🙈

[Hardy Boy]

Ha ha! Thats why I am contemplating getting in touch with Peter, HB!

Just tell him you love his selection of music Snow, it’s bound to put you in the good books with him.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p009491v


Professor Peter Vanezis
Desert Island Discs

Sue Lawley's castaway on Desert Island Discs is the Regius Professor of Foresenic Medicine and Science at the University of Glasgow, Peter Vanezis.

Professor Vanezis has had a major role in examining the mass graves found in Bosnia, Rwanda and Chile and is a member of the international scientific team working on Otzi the 'Iceman' - the 5,300-year-old mummy discovered in the Alps in 1991. In conversation with Sue Lawley, he talks about his life and work and chooses eight records to take to the mythical island.

[Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs]

Record: Chorus of the Hebrew Slaves
Book: Christ Re-Crucified by Nicos Kazantsakis
Luxury: Big photo album of friends and family