Author Topic: Bamber v Eaton and others [2004] EWHC 2437  (Read 596 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Bamber v Eaton and others [2004] EWHC 2437
« on: December 10, 2025, 09:32:PM »
I have attached the ruling from Jeremy's civil case against the extended family in 2004. This is in regards to moneys owed from his shares in the Osea Road Campsite.

I do not believe this has ever been posted on here before.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Bamber v Eaton and others [2004] EWHC 2437
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2025, 08:29:AM »
I have attached the ruling from Jeremy's civil case against the extended family in 2004. This is in regards to moneys owed from his shares in the Osea Road Campsite.

I do not believe this has ever been posted on here before.
Jeremy had been legally disinherited from his grandmother's will. The dividend payment from the profits of the Osea Road caravan park was not a formal agreement put down on paper: Pamela used to give her share to her daughter, whilst June, faced with the strong suspicion from the break-in, had refused to write out any more personal cheques in her son's favour.

It also stated that the law of laches came into effect, which I think means too much time had elapsed since the accusation that he was being swindled out of some share of the profits for it to be considered by a judge.