Author Topic: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent  (Read 12531 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bill Robertson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
  • In my opinion
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #135 on: December 01, 2025, 03:02:PM »
Strange Jean Rowe heard a dog barking, but Milbank claimed to hear what he thought were voices. I can't help but think he was inventing things, though for what reason I don't know.
In my opinion, he was caught on the hop and disclosing as little as possible. I don't know where he was when Heidi Blake called him - at Essex Police HQ I would imagine.

https://empowerinnocent.wixsite.com/ccrcwatch/post/jeremy-bamber-case-has-the-dim-witted-ccrc-been-totally-duped-by-nick-milbank-and-essex-police

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2442
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #136 on: December 01, 2025, 03:13:PM »
So can we hear a call from Milbank or not?

Offline Bill Robertson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
  • In my opinion
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #137 on: December 01, 2025, 04:38:PM »
So can we hear a call from Milbank or not?
Yes, on Spotify - Blood Relatives episode 5
« Last Edit: December 02, 2025, 05:00:AM by Bill Robertson »

Online BarefootDanC

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #138 on: December 01, 2025, 09:52:PM »
In my opinion, he was caught on the hop and disclosing as little as possible. I don't know where he was when Heidi Blake called him - at Essex Police HQ I would imagine.

https://empowerinnocent.wixsite.com/ccrcwatch/post/jeremy-bamber-case-has-the-dim-witted-ccrc-been-totally-duped-by-nick-milbank-and-essex-police

So why would be disclose anything at all. If, as you suggest, he didn't want to disclose that Sheila called 999 and he took the call at 6:09, why say anything at all? Why say anything if he was (in effect) on the conspiracy of silence?

Online handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #139 on: December 01, 2025, 10:15:PM »
So why would be disclose anything at all. If, as you suggest, he didn't want to disclose that Sheila called 999 and he took the call at 6:09, why say anything at all? Why say anything if he was (in effect) on the conspiracy of silence?

From my memory of the podcast, I think Milbank said there was a 999 call from WHF he never said it was from Sheila.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #140 on: December 01, 2025, 10:17:PM »
From my memory of the podcast, I think Milbank said there was a 999 call from WHF he never said it was from Sheila.

Correct

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #141 on: December 01, 2025, 11:12:PM »
Jeremy always contradicted his WS that 'the phone went dead'. As the receiver was off the hook when first checked by Jean Rowe.

At least Sheila knew to dial 999 in an emergency. Rather than look for the number of a Police station over 20 miles away which Bamber & Nevill did. Although a bit late by 6.09am.

Seems that no one told Sheila she is supposed to speak when the phone is answered. Or better still speak to the police who had been outside with a loud speaker for 2 hours.

« Last Edit: December 01, 2025, 11:18:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online handymanz

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #142 on: December 02, 2025, 03:04:AM »

At least Sheila knew to dial 999 in an emergency. Rather than look for the number of a Police station over 20 miles away which Bamber & Nevill did. Although a bit late by 6.09am.

Seems that no one told Sheila she is supposed to speak when the phone is answered. Or better still speak to the police who had been outside with a loud speaker for 2 hours.

In the podcast Jeremy gives a plausible reason why he dialed the local Police Station.

No one will ever know why Sheila didn't speak on the phone, there could be any number of reasons.

Offline Bill Robertson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
  • In my opinion
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #143 on: December 02, 2025, 09:29:AM »
So why would be disclose anything at all. If, as you suggest, he didn't want to disclose that Sheila called 999 and he took the call at 6:09, why say anything at all? Why say anything if he was (in effect) on the conspiracy of silence?
I suspect that he was discombobulated when something he hoped would never happen was unexpectedly occurring, so he had to suddenly think of something to say.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #144 on: December 02, 2025, 01:16:PM »
In the podcast Jeremy gives a plausible reason why he dialed the local Police Station.

No one will ever know why Sheila didn't speak on the phone, there could be any number of reasons.

Believe he said he didn't know if it was an emergency. The words 'crazy' & 'gun' at 3.10am suggests it was. He said himself Sheila 'should be locked up'.

Why would Nevill call Chelmsford Police instead of 999?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13159
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #145 on: December 02, 2025, 03:18:PM »
Believe he said he didn't know if it was an emergency. The words 'crazy' & 'gun' at 3.10am suggests it was. He said himself Sheila 'should be locked up'.

Why would Nevill call Chelmsford Police instead of 999?

That is a good point.  Reference JBs call descriptions.

« Last Edit: December 02, 2025, 03:19:PM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5953
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #146 on: December 02, 2025, 04:54:PM »
Jeremy always contradicted his WS that 'the phone went dead'. As the receiver was off the hook when first checked by Jean Rowe.

At least Sheila knew to dial 999 in an emergency. Rather than look for the number of a Police station over 20 miles away which Bamber & Nevill did. Although a bit late by 6.09am.

Seems that no one told Sheila she is supposed to speak when the phone is answered. Or better still speak to the police who had been outside with a loud speaker for 2 hours.
Ha ha, very good, Adam, very good!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #147 on: December 02, 2025, 05:47:PM »
You can't keep a good " man " down ! Hello All.




A question--------did Milbank know June and Nevill personally ?


Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #148 on: December 02, 2025, 07:06:PM »
You can't keep a good " man " down ! Hello All.




A question--------did Milbank know June and Nevill personally ?

More to the point! Very clearly you can't keep a good woman down, either!! Welcome back! Great to see you posting again xx

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13159
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #149 on: December 02, 2025, 07:57:PM »
Jeremy in fairness has gone from "my father sounded really frightened I don't think he was kidding " To in the recent podcast " I thought dad would say " For fucks Jeremy why did you phone the police for "

Accept that after 40 years of jail the mind is frazzled. 
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me