Author Topic: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent  (Read 12537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jonathan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 416
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #165 on: December 06, 2025, 01:16:PM »
The Milbank story has been around since 2017 - that's a long time to obtain a sworn affadavit. I haven't heard if Jeremy and his team have got one.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #166 on: December 06, 2025, 04:35:PM »
The Milbank story has been around since 2017 - that's a long time to obtain a sworn affadavit. I haven't heard if Jeremy and his team have got one.

If the Milibank " Story " Has any merit it's been around since August 1985.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #167 on: December 08, 2025, 01:16:PM »
You only have to follow the Logs and Statements from West, Inspector Burrell and Jean Rowe and the Incident room made 40 years back, they all show the same thing: WHF wasn’t calling 999, it was being patched into the 9-system so police could monitor an off-the-hook line.”  The argument that they were all Fabricated proves nothing and never will?

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #168 on: December 08, 2025, 02:28:PM »
You only have to follow the Logs and Statements from West, Inspector Burrell and Jean Rowe and the Incident room made 40 years back, they all show the same thing: WHF wasn’t calling 999, it was being patched into the 9-system so police could monitor an off-the-hook line.”  The argument that they were all Fabricated proves nothing and never will?
This one from the Incident room confirms that the open line was set up at 6.09 am,  it says an open 999 Direct line set up, to the house with the phone off the hook.  So if something is set up it’s been done intentionally and by a request.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=732.0;attach=19546;image





« Last Edit: December 08, 2025, 08:25:PM by Hardy Boy »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #169 on: December 09, 2025, 11:31:AM »
This one from the Incident room confirms that the open line was set up at 6.09 am,  it says an open 999 Direct line set up, to the house with the phone off the hook.  So if something is set up it’s been done intentionally and by a request.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=732.0;attach=19546;image

Good find.

The CCRC will have a lot of documents. Some of which are not online.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #170 on: December 09, 2025, 12:32:PM »
Good find.

The CCRC will have a lot of documents. Some of which are not online.
For the CCRC to refer any Possible MOJ it must believe there’s a real possibility of overturning the conviction, how can they build a case on withheld evidence, it’s not possible, how can they test the evidence if it’s not supplied in its unedited version?  Even if the CCRC interviewed Millbank before Essex Police,  the logs from 40 years ago would still override a memory from 40 years ago. 

If He talked freely and still offered nothing conclusive on the podcast,  why expect a CCRC interview to create evidence he didn’t give on the podcast?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #171 on: December 10, 2025, 10:04:AM »
If the Milibank " Story " Has any merit it's been around since August 1985.
/quote]               





I thought that myself ILB.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #172 on: December 10, 2025, 10:39:AM »
If the Milibank " Story " Has any merit it's been around since August 1985.
/quote]               





I thought that myself ILB.
Hi Lookout, I think the Jean Rowe statement proves without doubt there was no 999 call and simply an operator patching through an open line…….she says she didn’t even listen in ( an operators job is to listen to a 999 call, access and try to promote if the caller doesn’t speak and try to decide which emergency service to direct the call to). The only reason she didn’t listen in, was because she was simply performing a request, that was to patch it through to the IR via the 9 System.

There was no 999 call, the Logs and statements prove this, all this together wasn’t coincidence, it was an operation via communication with the raid team (who wanted updates from the open line) and the incident room via and the Operator.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Nick Milbank confirms that Jeremy Bamber is innocent
« Reply #173 on: December 10, 2025, 10:55:AM »
More to the point! Very clearly you can't keep a good woman down, either!! Welcome back! Great to see you posting again xx




Aw, sorry for the delay Jane. Thankyou and glad to be posting. I'm afraid my interest has/is in the restoring of chateax in France believe it or not. The marvellous work that's achieved, sometimes single-handedly. However, thought I'd pop in and try and keep up to date. Lovely to still see you xx