Author Topic: New Yorker podcast  (Read 27466 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #210 on: January 08, 2026, 01:30:PM »
Dont talk stupid, Craig arrived at 8.30amn he finished certifying death  at 8,50am Taff arrived at 9.00am, where’s he got time to go over forensic analysis with Harris before Taff Arrived, this is the level of investigation you accept!  It was a murder scene that needed in depth investigation and not Cameo appearances.  Fking  long before my Arse!  Craig experienced to conduct a SOC  murder investigation in 25 mins, don’t make me laugh 😂😂😂😂

Ah yes, Dr Craig who spent less than 30 minutes at the scene, bottle of whiskey on the hip.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2026, 01:33:PM by David1819 »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #211 on: January 08, 2026, 02:07:PM »
Ah yes, Dr Craig who spent less than 30 minutes at the scene, bottle of whiskey on the hip.
I agree, Cutie uses him as though he’s a forensic expert and with his 25 mins appearance inside WHF he’d sorted the whole suicide murder theory out.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #212 on: January 08, 2026, 04:00:PM »
I wonder what his conclusion was on the burn marks? Oh wait he never done an examination in the first place.

PS, don't refer to her as "cutie" she does not live up to that description, trust me.
Cant remember why he didn’t do a body temp can you?

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #213 on: January 08, 2026, 04:43:PM »
Cant remember why he didn’t do a body temp can you?

From my perspective it is obvious.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #214 on: January 08, 2026, 04:51:PM »
From my perspective it is obvious.
I couldn’t remember what reason he gave?

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #215 on: January 08, 2026, 04:56:PM »
I couldn’t remember what reason he gave?
He probably wasn’t asked?

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #216 on: January 08, 2026, 05:10:PM »
Cant remember why he didn’t do a body temp can you?
Found it, I thought ut was something to do with this.


Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #217 on: January 08, 2026, 07:57:PM »
Found it, I thought ut was something to do with this.

Once again you return to the investigation where EP marked their own homework. Keneally had already conducted a review and said it was SC.

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #218 on: January 08, 2026, 08:03:PM »
Once again you return to the investigation where EP marked their own homework. Keneally had already conducted a review and said it was SC.
What do you mean, I was looking for the reason that Dr Craig didn’t take body temp?  Where’s Keneally come in with found it?

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #219 on: January 08, 2026, 09:05:PM »
Cant remember why he didn’t do a body temp can you?

But even if he had it is not a determinant of tod especially in a relatively small window.  From Prof Knight:

Professor Bernard Knight, a renowned forensic pathologist and writer, highlighted in his work that body temperature is not an "exact" measurement due to the wide range of physiological and environmental factors that cause it to fluctuate, making it an unreliable sole indicator for precise estimations like time of death in forensic science.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #220 on: January 08, 2026, 09:08:PM »
But even if he had it is not a determinant of tod especially in a relatively small window.  From Prof Knight:

Professor Bernard Knight, a renowned forensic pathologist and writer, highlighted in his work that body temperature is not an "exact" measurement due to the wide range of physiological and environmental factors that cause it to fluctuate, making it an unreliable sole indicator for precise estimations like time of death in forensic science.
I know, but it might have shut the conspiracy theorists up who think that the Police shot June or the Police shot Sheila?

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #221 on: January 08, 2026, 09:14:PM »
There is a very narrow window where Nevill could phone Bamber. After receiving his 4 shots & before the kitchen attack. However huge benefits of the doubt have to applied on multiple issues.

Please provide the source that Nevill did not like involving the police when someone has 'gone crazy' with a gun.

Bamber said he rang Witham.

NB called JB before any shots were fired.  He left the phone to run upstairs when SC opened fire on June.  This is what all the physcial evidence supports.  You know this hence your tagline except others know too.

I never said NB did not like involving the police when someone had 'gone crazy' with a gun.  I said it is well documented the Bambers were private people especially with regards to family matters. 

Bamber is wrong.  NB did not call Witham as evidenced by the soc. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #222 on: January 08, 2026, 09:17:PM »
I know, but it might have shut the conspiracy theorists up who think that the Police shot June or the Police shot Sheila?

Nothing anyone says will the shut the conspiracy theorists up.  They go from one totally unhinged theory to another.

Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Jonathan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 416
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #223 on: January 08, 2026, 09:26:PM »
Unlike you I have previously uploaded my image to the forum.  The image is now my avatar.  Hows about you uploading your image and then we can all see how aesthetically challenged you are.

As Jeremy said in the police car it's what's inside that matters!

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Re: New Yorker podcast
« Reply #224 on: January 08, 2026, 09:40:PM »
Cant remember why he didn’t do a body temp can you?

Because he never done an examination.