Jeremy Bamber is defiant, and believes there's a " cover up "

[ILB]

https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/25363269.jeremy-bamber-ccrc-covering-up-essex-police/

[Steve_uk]

https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/25363269.jeremy-bamber-ccrc-covering-up-essex-police/

There is a cover up: the article is behind a paywall.

[ngb1066]

There is a cover up: the article is behind a paywall.

It cost £6.  It is the first of a series of four articles on the case.  It has apparently been under preparation for a while.

[Curiosity]

It cost £6.  It is the first of a series of four articles on the case.  It has apparently been under preparation for a while.

This is exactly the same article by the same reporter from the same Essex provincial newspaper group, but with no paywall.

And the same old repetitive garbage from Bamber re. the CCRC covering up for Essex Police -

https://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/25363269.jeremy-bamber-ccrc-covering-up-essex-police/?ref=rss

[ILB]

There is a cover up: the article is behind a paywall.

Was free when I accessed it

[Curiosity]

Another crackpot theory from Bamber and his chief supporter. With outlandish claims like this, they don't stand a chance in hell of ever proving innocence and his conviction being quashed -

https://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/25363333.jeremy-bamber-claims-essex-police-shot-sisters-body/

[Roch]

Another crackpot theory from Bamber and his chief supporter. With outlandish claims like this, they don't stand a chance in hell of ever proving innocence and his conviction being quashed -

https://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/25363333.jeremy-bamber-claims-essex-police-shot-sisters-body/

It's not a crackpot theory if it happened.

[Curiosity]

It's not a crackpot theory if it happened.

But it didn't happen.  The two wounds were inflicted at the same time, as evidenced by the freshness and direction of blood flow on Sheila's neck. During later 'informatives' the TFG wouldn't say - "She's attempted suicide but failed with one shot, so we'll just make sure with a second".

[Jane]

Another crackpot theory from Bamber and his chief supporter. With outlandish claims like this, they don't stand a chance in hell of ever proving innocence and his conviction being quashed -

https://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/25363333.jeremy-bamber-claims-essex-police-shot-sisters-body/

Oh! This isn't just "another crackpot theory"! It's way over the top outlandish!! Known -accepted- facts twisted beyond recognition. 'Course, it's probably the same garbage that the Gazette print, the criteria possibly being why let the truth stand in the way of a good story?

[Steve_uk]

It's not a crackpot theory if it happened.

The murder weapon was particularly stiff. Didn't one of the police drop it at trial?

By the way, who is Philip Walker?

[ILB]

The murder weapon was particularly stiff. Didn't one of the police drop it at trial?

By the way, who is Philip Walker? He's looking more and more sinister by the day. Does anyone have more background information on him?

A businessman who took an interest in the case I believe.

[ILB]

Another crackpot theory from Bamber and his chief supporter. With outlandish claims like this, they don't stand a chance in hell of ever proving innocence and his conviction being quashed -

https://www.maldonandburnhamstandard.co.uk/news/25363333.jeremy-bamber-claims-essex-police-shot-sisters-body/

Although on the fence I have to agree. I believe this to be completely a crackpot theory.

[ngb1066]

The murder weapon was particularly stiff. Didn't one of the police drop it at trial?

By the way, who is Philip Walker? He's looking more and more sinister by the day. Does anyone have more background information on him?

He is not sinister in any way.  He is a very capable individual who has been successful in his business and has researched this case very thoroughly.  You may disagree with the conclusions he has reached but he is certainly not an idiot.  Although not legally qualified he has a very good understanding of the legal and evidential issues in the case.  There has been a more professional approach since he became involved.

[Roch]

Oh! This isn't just "another crackpot theory"! It's way over the top outlandish!! Known -accepted- facts twisted beyond recognition. 'Course, it's probably the same garbage that the Gazette print, the criteria possibly being why let the truth stand in the way of a good story?

It's only outlandish if it's incorrect. The Gazette has possibly misrepresented the claims. The argument is that police quite rightly went with Sheila, until there was a danger of what happened being exposed. The danger in question would have been a consequence of RB and the relatives going to the press. The problem is that the police made a decision not to come clean at the outset. That decision arguably governs their actions further down the line. It's not like they can go back in time and change their decision. So they were stuck with it.

[Bubo bubo]

Members may care to examine these earlier posts. I  believe The second shot was not an accident but a deliberate act to cover up the accidental shooting of June.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10645.msg492394.html#msg492394

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10645.msg494127.html#msg494127

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10728.msg494521.html#msg494521

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11984.msg552825.html#msg552825

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12558.msg581275.html#msg581275

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12309.msg570035.html#msg570035

There is a discrepancy between the bullet weight as recorded by Taylor and the bullet weight given by MF