Bulletpath article.

[ILB]

So there was no gym.

His memory is probably knackered by the years of imprisonment to be honest.

He does say in interviews " we had talked of different purposes"

[Adam]

If there was a gym which was a 10 minute cycle ride away, that would be more convincing than Julie cycling to TD.

Julie could get a bus, taxi or Bamber could allocate 7-14 minutes to drive her.

[ILB]

Perhaps he simply couldnt be arsed to drive her.

Selfishness on his part whatever.

Perhaps she had travelpass who knows.

[Adam]

Perhaps he simply couldnt be arsed to drive her.

Selfishness on his part whatever.

Perhaps she had travelpass who knows.

That would be selfish.

He had driven her the previous 18 months. Only takes 7-14 minutes.

[ILB]

That would be selfish.

He had driven her the previous 18 months. Only takes 7-14 minutes.

We've got one recollection of him dropping her off at Colchester railway station on the Sunday proceeding the massacre.

She spent time at bourtree, and he would drive to her digs in London.

Agree in fairness if he dropped her off at the railway station on the Sunday, then one can infer it is something he did regular. But  nobody knows except Jeremy and Julie for sure.

[ILB]

Julie says " we had discussed me getting the bike " she was quite vague on it to be honest. In fairness though Bamber himself didnt expand much further.

Julie never point said though, " Jeremy's reason for getting the bike for me is a load of bollocks"

They are both in agreed fact about the bike being used for the use of Julie. The point is when at what stage.

Did they discuss it on the 5th? That's the day Julie says she first saw it?

She makes no recollection of Bamber bringing it over in his car from WHF, disagree with Adam it had arrived two days prior.

[ILB]

Likely he brought it over to Bourtree some point in July 85.

He may have put it in his shed so Julie may not have seen it at various stages.

He may have done trial runs in the days weeks proceeding hence he left it out.

[Adam]

Doubt Bamber spent much time working when Julie was there. Otherwise there is no point in her visiting.

She is not going hang around sleepy GH all day waiting for him to get home at 10pm.

[ILB]

Doubt Bamber spent much time working when Julie was there. Otherwise there is no point in her visiting.

She is not going hang around sleepy GH all day waiting for him to get home at 10pm.

She was in a relationship with him.

It was probably a welcome break for Julie to have a property to herself as she was used to sharing digs with other students etc.

[ILB]

Doubt Bamber spent much time working when Julie was there. Otherwise there is no point in her visiting.

She is not going hang around sleepy GH all day waiting for him to get home at 10pm.

When do you first believe Jeremy knew Shelia and the boys were staying at WHF?

CCs recollection is he told him on the party at Saturday. Days before.

Julie says he " made no mention of murdering anybody that weekend"

If he first learnt the Saturday he must have done a trial run on the Monday evening. It's his only feasible window to have done so. Otherwise none.

[ILB]

Suppose he could have done one Sunday night after dropping Julie off. He was alone.

[Adam]

She was in a relationship with him.

It was probably a welcome break for Julie to have a property to herself as she was used to sharing digs with other students etc.

Doubt Bamber would invite her over if he was working 14 hour days. Or that Julie would make the long journey.

[ILB]

Doubt Bamber would invite her over if he was working 14 hour days. Or that Julie would make the long journey.

she probably came over on periods when she had free time.

Seems Bamber would drive to London and spend the night before coming back to tollshunt D'Arcy for work.

[ILB]

If Jeremy's lying over the bike for Julie, she has never denied it.

It's obvious the two are up to their neck in it. This is no damsel, passive collaborator scenario. It went tit's up when he jilted her.

[Adam]

Will make a start on the article now. See what I agree & disagree with.