Bulletpath article.

[Adam]

Only thing that was physically impossible was walking across the fields. Says Wilkinson's WS.

Although Rob still promotes this method.

[ILB]

If it was a non starter it would not be the EP & the prosecution narrative.

For me it was a clever narrative for the prosecution to use but not feasible.

There is little point us going over the argument. Our views are well known.

[ILB]

But agree, I believe he drove in his car.

He may have cycled the road. I dont believe he cycled the sea wall.

[ILB]

Im currently in a little village called patrington in east Yorkshire. I have a little holiday lodge there. This morning we drove to the local shop to get some butter. Very small village, akin to to goldhanger but less remote I would say. Not one person  clocked us driving.

I would wager that 2am odds in goldhanger would have been very favourable to him.

[Adam]

Officially he had 11 transport options -

4 cycle routes 

4 walking routes.

3 driving routes.

---------

The prosecution had to choose one to make things simple for the jury.

[ILB]

Most were simple.

They had to choose one which would fit the narrative. Not one person saw Jeremy Bamber. So they went with the sea wall.

[ILB]

Only thing that was physically impossible was walking across the fields. Says Wilkinson's WS.

Although Rob still promotes this method.

Bamber says he had " no idea " of the route calling " travelling over land madness and laughable "

You yourself says he was intimate with it having worked and travelled the land. If he was he'd possibly be intimate with routes in a way more than Wilkinson was as he knew the vicinity if he knew it as well as you think.

[Adam]

When I went to visit relatives outside London by train, I looked at the dividers between fields.

Some it would be easy to get to the next field. Others it was not possible due to hedges, bushes, dips, mini streams. Or a combination of these.

The 2.2 miles straight line walking route across fields would turn into 4 miles due to the constant zig zagging needed.

So too long and tiring if there was even a way, which Wilkinson says there wasn't. 

Bamber bringing June's bike to WHF 2 days before the massacre.

[Adam]

To walk in a straight line he would walk across 15 fields. There are two properties he would have to avoid.

The constant zig zagging may mean he would have to walk across 20+ fields.

Farm fields are for tractors or farm workers. Not for walking across. So the terrain would be tiring.

He would constantly have to get to the next field. There may be gaps where he could do this, but it may not be easy.

So can understand why he brought June's bike over two days beforehand.

[Steve_uk]

Bamber says he had " no idea " of the route calling " travelling over land madness and laughable "

You yourself says he was intimate with it having worked and travelled the land. If he was he'd possibly be intimate with routes in a way more than Wilkinson was as he knew the vicinity if he knew it as well as you think.

Again, he overcooks it in the forlorn hope that newbies to the case with only the most superficial knowledge will take him at his word. Of course he was familiar with the geography of the area, and he's insulting people's intelligence by arguing to the contrary.

[ILB]

To walk in a straight line he would walk across 15 fields. There are two properties he would have to avoid.

15 fields?

[ILB]

Again, he overcooks it in the forlorn hope that newbies to the case with only the most superficial knowledge will take him at his word. Of course he was familiar with the geography of the area, and he's insulting people's intelligence by arguing to the contrary.

Believe this would have been the first time he would have travelled to tollshunt D'Arcy from Bourtree in this manner.

The guy drove.

[ILB]

Farm fields are for tractors or farm workers. Not for walking across. So the terrain would be tiring.

My current view, I would have no problem walking this field. Every farmers field no doubt differs.

[ILB]

To walk in a straight line he would walk across 15 fields. There are two properties he would have to avoid.

The constant zig zagging may mean he would have to walk across 20+ fields.

Farm fields are for tractors or farm workers. Not for walking across. So the terrain would be tiring.

He would constantly have to get to the next field. There may be gaps where he could do this, but it may not be easy.

So can understand why he brought June's bike over two days beforehand.

Not promoting the walking theory, but possible Bamber was much more intimate with it perhaps then Wilkinson. Bamber being a local may have known lots of nooks and crannys.

[Adam]

Believe this would have been the first time he would have travelled to tollshunt D'Arcy from Bourtree in this manner.

The guy drove.

First and last.

He may have done a trial cycle ride the night before. On some of his chosen route.

When a boy he may have gone cycling a lot. Boys have lots of energy.

The CT suggest if he had travelled via the main roads he would have been seen. They boast that no one saw him.