DocMaker article on Milbank

[Steve_uk]

I have a large amount of material, much of it posted here but other elements I have seen over the past 14 years during which I have had some involvement.  However, I am not and never have been a member of the CT.  Anything I have been given in confidence I will not publish, even where I think there would be no harm in doing so.

I do not know any more about the New Yorker audio files than has already been posted.

This site is always the last to know anything re: the Jeremy Bamber case.

[ILB]

JB has probably been on a 48 hour lockdown recently due to the Ian Watkins debacle.

[Steve_uk]

JB has probably been on a 48 hour lockdown recently due to the Ian Watkins debacle.

The misuse of drugs has a lot to answer for: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2d2me0eljo

[ngb1066]

This site is always the last to know anything re: the Jeremy Bamber case.

Why do you say that?

[Steve_uk]

Why do you say that?

Part tongue in cheek, but we don't seem to have moved on recently.

[ngb1066]

Part tongue in cheek, but we don't seem to have moved on recently.

I agree that news has been very limited. 

[Steve_uk]

I have a large amount of material, much of it posted here but other elements I have seen over the past 14 years during which I have had some involvement.  However, I am not and never have been a member of the CT.  Anything I have been given in confidence I will not publish, even where I think there would be no harm in doing so.

I do not know any more about the New Yorker audio files than has already been posted.

Since it's half term and the site has been struggling a little of late maybe you could disclose some titbits from your profession without betraying any confidences. Think Rumpole of the Bailey, Patrick Hasting's Cases in Court, that kind of thing.

[snow66!]

Since it's half term and the site has been struggling a little of late maybe you could disclose some titbits from your profession without betraying any confidences. Think Rumpole of the Bailey, Patrick Hasting's Cases in Court, that kind of thing.

You will hopefully get the New Yorker article on Milbank tomorrow, Steve.
That may give you something juicy to get your teeth into!

[Steve_uk]

You will hopefully get the New Yorker article on Milbank tomorrow, Steve.
That may give you something juicy to get your teeth into!

Well maybe Dame Vera Baird will get her teeth into in too.

[snow66!]

Well maybe Dame Vera Baird will get her teeth into in too.

Who knows, Steve! Maybe, but if its that compelling, why haven't they given the evidence to JBs legal team yet?

[Steve_uk]

Who knows, Steve! Maybe, but if its that compelling, why haven't they given the evidence to JBs legal team yet?

It's all a mystery to me. I respect those who call for full disclosure, but not people who claim police shot Sheila and all that stuff.

[BarefootDanC]

This site is always the last to know anything re: the Jeremy Bamber case.

I have been assured by the Campaign Team (Simon Kelly) that once the CCRC (and any appeal) has ran its course, they will be able to share all the "new evidence" publicly.

They say that if they do not hold certain cards close to their chest, it would somehow harm the CCRC application. Make of that what you will.

[Steve_uk]

I have been assured by the Campaign Team (Simon Kelly) that once the CCRC (and any appeal) has ran its course, they will be able to share all the "new evidence" publicly.

They say that if they do not hold certain cards close to their chest, it would somehow harm the CCRC application. Make of that what you will.

I was thinking more of the documents sealed until 2054. It does make one suspicious as to why that should be.

[snow66!]

I have been assured by the Campaign Team (Simon Kelly) that once the CCRC (and any appeal) has ran its course, they will be able to share all the "new evidence" publicly.

They say that if they do not hold certain cards close to their chest, it would somehow harm the CCRC application. Make of that what you will.

Surely they are hoping that once the CCRC application and appeal has run its course, that JB will finally be a free man, Dan? Else their cards are of no importance!

[Steve_uk]

Surely they are hoping that once the CCRC application and appeal has run its course, that JB will finally be a free man, Dan? Else their cards are of no importance!

I don't see how the Establishment can ever release someone who may make his way down to Essex with a rifle on his person.