DocMaker article on Milbank

[ILB]

Many people use an alias on public forums and there is nothing wrong with that.  What is wrong in my view is requiring members to use their real names whislt prending that he was setting an example by doing the same.  I know there are people here who fell for it.  Erik Narramore exists in the USA, but has nothing to do with QCC.

Self explanatory that QC was attempting to override this forum by creating his own. He had problems and issues with the moderation team.

He seemed heavily invested in the case and mentioned he had phone contact and correspondence with Jeremy years back, like me and Mike its possible they're paths may have crossed in prison. But perhaps not.

A CT member in an email to me some time back ( who I will not name) referred to him as Erik Narramore.

[Adam]

Looks like The Doc Maker is someone called Sean BW Parker. He posts on X.

[ngb1066]

Looks like The Doc Maker is someone called Sean BW Parker. He posts on X.

No he is not.

[ngb1066]

Self explanatory that QC was attempting to override this forum by creating his own. He had problems and issues with the moderation team.

He seemed heavily invested in the case and mentioned he had phone contact and correspondence with Jeremy years back, like me and Mike its possible they're paths may have crossed in prison. But perhaps not.

A CT member in an email to me some time back ( who I will not name) referred to him as Erik Narramore.

That is because he has used that name throughout his involvement in this case.  It is not his real name.

[Adam]

No he is not.

Yes he is.

He posted the exact same post on X as on one of his Doc Maker vlogs. Word for word.

[Adam]

Apparently the Doc Maker is not Guest29835 or Sean BW Parker. Despite a mountain of evidence.

Who is he? NGB won't say.

[Adam]

For me The Doc Maker is Guest29835/Sean BW Parker.

Need more than a 3 word rebuttal to change my mind.

But not that important.

[Roch]

For me The Doc Maker is Guest29835/Sean BW Parker.

Need more than a 3 word rebuttal to change my mind.

But not that important.

I'm sure if he is reading this, the member formerly known as QC Chevalier will be amused that you have attributed the doc -maker blog to him.

[Adam]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12385.msg578393.html#msg578393

The quote in reply 82 was on the Doc Makers vlog. Prior to it being blocked by a paywall.

The exact same quote is on X under Sean BW Parker.

[Roch]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12385.msg578393.html#msg578393

The quote in reply 82 was on the Doc Makers vlog. Prior to it being blocked by a paywall.

The exact same quote is on X under Sean BW Parker.

This would make a good profile pic for you Adam

[Adam]

This would make a good profile pic for you Adam

Thought his wetsuit was black.

Possible he wore a wetsuit. He could shower at WHF prior to leaving. Blood would easily come off.

Then he would not need a washing machine.

He would still wear shoes.

[Curiosity]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12385.msg578393.html#msg578393

The quote in reply 82 was on the Doc Makers vlog. Prior to it being blocked by a paywall.

The exact same quote is on X under Sean BW Parker.

Because he copied and pasted it from the docmaker (Mat Harris) blog site, silly sossij.

[Adam]

Because he copied and pasted it from the docmaker (Mat Harris) blog site, silly sossij.

Of course he did.

[Adam]

We do know Bamber had a wet suit. If it was black, that would help.

It was summer so he would not need layers of clothes when cycling.

Any blood on a wet suit will easily come off in a shower.

He can still wear shoes. He will still be agile enough.

So quite possible he wore a WS.

[Adam]

I do not believe Bamber wore flippers.

Some supporters have suggested he would do this if wearing a WS 

No proof he had flippers. He was a wind surfer, not a diver.