DocMaker article on Milbank

[Adam]

Guest29835's stance has always been if things submitted to the COA, CCRC & media were included at the 1986 trial, he may have been aquited.

We will never know. However everything submitted to the CCRC & COA has since been dismissed. Except DNA evidence which was successful at the CCRC but unsuccessful at the COA. So no guarantee he would have been aquited.

Some of these things his lawyers would refuse to include in his 1986 trial as they are too ridiculous.

Also unlikely he had the finance to drag out the trial to months rather than weeks & numb the jury to submission. As OJ did a decade later.

But he's entitled to search for a technicality.

[ILB]

Seems Guest29835's journey was -

In prison. Gets grudge against authorities. Dates unknown.

Watches WHF drama. Jan 2020. Reads up on case.

Joins forum June 2020.

Gets second permanent ban 2022.

Creates his own forum 2022.

Starts vlogging 2024 as forum defunct.

I dont think he merely watched the drama. I think his interest came way before 2020.

He himself told me he had corresponded with Jeremy many years ago and they had spoke on the phone.

[Adam]

His guilty but would not convict is 40 years later. With all the internet bluster & appeals.

In 1986 he would have convicted.

[ngb1066]

Seems Guest29835's journey was -

In prison. Gets grudge against authorities. Dates unknown.

Watches WHF drama. Jan 2020. Reads up on case.

Joins this forum June 2020.

Gets second permanent ban 2022.

Creates his own forum 2022.

Starts vlogging 2024 as his own forum defunct.

This is getting tedious Adam.  You have been told that QCC is not the DocMaker.  That is a fact, not a matter of opinion.

[Adam]

I dont think he merely watched the drama. I think his interest came way before 2020.

He himself told me he had corresponded with Jeremy many years ago and they had spoke on the phone.

https://thedocmaker.substack.com/p/down-the-bamber-rabbit-hole

He says it started from watching the drama.

[Jane]

https://thedocmaker.substack.com/p/down-the-bamber-rabbit-hole

He says it started from watching the drama.

We only have his word for it, though.

[ILB]

https://thedocmaker.substack.com/p/down-the-bamber-rabbit-hole

He says it started from watching the drama.

Im on about QC.

Ngb has said QC is not the docmaker

[Adam]

Im on about QC.

Ngb has said QC is not the docmaker

Do you think it is  coincidence that the Doc Maker started posting after Guest29835's forum became defunct?

Both of them use the term 'Oskan's Razor'.

Both say they trawled forums & have a dig at them.

[Adam]

So where is Guest29835?

He is not going to go quietly because his forum is defunct?

[ILB]

So where is Guest29835?

He may be preoccupied with other things in his life, family work etc.

He may have lost interest.

Who knows.

[ngb1066]

So where is Guest29835?

He is not going to go quietly because his forum is defunct?

I do not know and I do not care where he is.  My guess is that he lost interest when his stupid rip off forum failed as soon as it started.

[Adam]

Who is this Doc Maker?

He appeared out of nowhere a year ago & has created over 40 long Vlogs.

Most you have to subscribe to in order to have the privilege to read it all.

[ILB]

Who is this Doc Maker?

He appeared out of nowhere a year ago & has created over 40 long Vlogs.

Most you have to subscribe to in order to have the privilege to read it all.

Probably just the same as you and I and etc, A person who has an interest in the case.

[BarefootDanC]

His guilty but would not convict is 40 years later. With all the internet bluster & appeals.

In 1986 he would have convicted.

The internet and the media shouldn't, at least in theory, make any different to the original trial because if a newspaper article or a social media post affects the jury in any way, this is Contempt of Court.

Also, had Jeremy's lawyers started to suggest that there were 2 - 5 silencers, all the CPS would have to do would be to recall the FSS as witnesses and ask them if they handled two different silencers. Them confirming that there was only one would silence this theory.

Even at the third appeal in 2002, despite Jeremy's lawyers putting forward 16 grounds, even they weren't prepared to argue silly things like 2-5 silencers.

[Adam]

Probably just the same as you and I and etc, A person who has an interest in the case.

He said he has trawled FB & forums. So our paths may have crossed.

He said the 2020 WHF drama got him interested & then he read up on the case. Obviously thinks he is now knowledgeable enough to create a lot of Vlogs & charge people for the priviledge of reading them.

Guest29835 used to boast about how knowledgeable he was on the case.