Adam's Claims...

[ILB]

Did Bamber know the relatives were suspicious so soon afterwards?

Either way he told Julie he was 'watertight' & it was an 'open & shut case'.

Course he did.

[Adam]

Course he did.

Sources please.

[Adam]

David says the relatives gained access on the 9th August. Only 2 days later.

The relatives would have just shown love to Bamber. Although had doubts in private.

[Steve_uk]

David says the relatives gained access on the 9th August. Only 2 days later.

The relatives would have just shown love to Bamber. Although had doubts in private.

I think that's overcooking it slightly.

[Adam]

I think that's overcooking it slightly.

Love and affection.

[ILB]

Sources please.

Sources for what ?

He's hardly going to start shouting to people " they think I've done it" that's gonna draw the wrong sort of attention. And if he's innocent he would just think they were being cold, remember he termed them " a bunch of fucking magpies"

You can pick up subtle signs easy.

[ILB]

Love and affection.

For about half an hour.

AE went cold after the fostering conversation.

[ILB]

Well, as someone said: his home was Bourtree Cottage, where he probably felt he could relax more, even though he grumbled about certain aspects at the time. He couldn't really ban the relatives from the building, which was public property run by the Henry Smith Foundation. He wouldn't wish to view the results of his handiwork, and possibly thought as a going concern the business would fetch more as a going concern, which he had no intention of running.

He could just say " I don't want you going in there " and the relatives would have to accept.

[Adam]

Sources for what ?

He's hardly going to start shouting to people " they think I've done it" that's gonna draw the wrong sort of attention. And if he's innocent he would just think they were being cold, remember he termed them " a bunch of fucking magpies"

You can pick up subtle signs easy.

Since the conviction has he never said 'I knew the relatives thought I was guilty within hours'?

If not, then why would he be against them entering WHF? He was on jolly ups duty.

[Adam]

He could just say " I don't want you going in there " and the relatives would have to accept.

Well he didn't.

Another mistake by him. No wonder Nevill had him out in the fields.

[ILB]

Well he didn't.

Another mistake by him. No wonder Nevill had him out in the fields.

What do you mean?

Nevill himself as the boss did the graft as well, it was a farm.

[ILB]

Well he didn't.

Another mistake by him. No wonder Nevill had him out in the fields.

You know Bamber isn't thick.

[Steve_uk]

You know Bamber isn't thick.

No, but it's mostly show. Don't scratch too hard beneath the veneer.

[ILB]

No, but it's mostly show. Don't scratch too hard beneath the veneer.

I am a good judge of character Steve.

[Adam]

The prosecution narrative on all aspects needs to be as straight forward as possible.

Too complex, intricate or confusing will just create reasonable doubt.

The simple explanations are usually the right ones.

On the silencer you can't get a more straight forward narrative than -

Bamber used it then put it away. Suspiscious relatives then found it.