Short video on goldhanger, sea wall chequers 1981

[Steve_uk]

Yes with regards to entering but he did not admit to knowing of a way to exit leaving any window secured from within.

I don't know for how long Barlow scrutinized the windows. Remember White House Farm had been Jeremy's home for years and he could easily have unloosened and banged a window shut with the help of a bradawl Barlow might have known nothing about.

[Cambridgecutie]

You have to take this into consideration, how many murders go back to the scene to cover something up?

Discovering new information about the investigation or remembering a forgotten detail can cause concern, leading them to believe that returning might help them eliminate evidence or correct a mistake. This behavior is often driven by a desire to avoid detection and the consequences of their actions.

But we know he had a legitimate reason for returning ie his car docs for travelling abroad.  The car docs were retained in the office at WHF.  It was a company car and the company business was run from WHF.

[Adam]

Because others claim JB claimed he knew of such when he claims he didn't.

I have always said it was something the jury needed to see for itself.  Too late now.

Julie knew about the window.

Guess who told her?

[Adam]

Because others claim JB claimed he knew of such when he claims he didn't.

I have always said it was something the jury needed to see for itself.  Too late now.

Rivlin went to WHF several times.

He wisely did not want the jury seeing the window.

[Cambridgecutie]

I don't know for how long Barlow scrutinized the windows. Remember White House Farm had been Jeremy's home for years and he could easily have unloosened and banged a window shut with the help of a bradawl Barlow might have known nothing about.

The people that needed to scrutinise the window(s) were jurors under the direction of prosecution, defence and any relevant experts.

[Cambridgecutie]

Rivlin went to WHF several times.

He wisely did not want the jury seeing the window.

I believe he went once.  Lets see the evidence of his visit(s) and what he actually looked at.

[Steve_uk]

Julie knew about the window.

Guess who told her?

That's a good point, Adam.

[Adam]

I believe he went once.  Lets see the evidence of his visit(s) and what he actually looked at.

ILB says 'from time to time'.

But once was enough.

[Adam]

I believe he went once.  Lets see the evidence of his visit(s) and what he actually looked at.

Number 1 thing to look at - window.

If he didn't it is too late now. All supporters can do is claim the police lied.

Lying would be very risky with the defence having over a year to prepare & check the window.

[Adam]

Bamber would have told his defence to look at the window.

If he didn't know of a window that could be banged shut.

If he didn't tell them, the defence would have checked anyway. Aware of the prosecution narrative.

[Cambridgecutie]

Julie knew about the window.

Guess who told her?

DS Jones 

[Cambridgecutie]

Bamber would have told his defence to look at the window.

If he didn't know of a window that could be banged shut.

If he didn't tell them, the defence would have checked anyway. Aware of the prosecution narrative.

Evidence.

[Adam]

DS Jones 

You forgot to say 'the treacherous' Stan Jones.

[Adam]

Evidence.

His police interviews. He said he did not know of such a window.

So would have told his defence to get evidence there was no such window.

[Adam]

The defence on both the window and Sea Wall was -

Yes it was possible to cycle it & bang the window shut. But that does not mean he did.