Short video on goldhanger, sea wall chequers 1981

[ILB]

So why did his defence not say so ?

And why has Bamber never had it as a ground in 4 applications?

Because he can access the sea wall from fish street.

Which is case of going out of his front door and down to fish street.

[ILB]

Adam asking me for why Bambers defence didn't or did do this in a trial from almost 40 years ago.

His best bet is to ask Bamber or Paul Terzeon. I wasn't on trial. I wasn't privy to private legal consultations Bamber had pre trial or what their pre trial strategy was.

[Adam]

Suppose Bamber can't claim people can't see in the dark.

He lived in a village with no street lighting!

[ILB]

RB does mention the a footpath a the rear of Jeremy's back garden. The neighbour didn't appear to mention it which is strange seeing if it was avaliable they'd share the same access.

What's certain is easy sea wall access is from fish street.

[ILB]

Suppose Bamber can't claim people can't see in the dark.

He lived in a village with no street lighting!

Cars have headlights.

[Adam]

No access.

The neighbour will be telling the truth.

RB said there was access. I don't recall the neighbour in the doc.

If access was hard, get hedge trimmers out.

It is called preparation.

[Adam]

RB does mention the a footpath a the rear of Jeremy's back garden. The neighbour didn't appear to mention it which is strange seeing if it was avaliable they'd share the same access.

What's certain is easy sea wall access is from fish street.

He's not going to cycle The Sea Wall to avoid properties. Then cycle up Head & Fish Street.

Simple solution is exit out of his back garden.

[Adam]

Exit out of back garden.

Along the edge of one field for 200 yards. Thistley Close not there.

Onto the Sea Wall. My three page 1 videos shows it is a dream route.

Passing no properties.

----------

Simple.

[ILB]

He's not going to cycle The Sea Wall to avoid properties. Then cycle up Head & Fish Street.

Simple solution is exit out of his back garden.

It is 1 minute

[ILB]

Exit out of back garden.

Along the edge of one field for 200 yards. Thistley Close not there.

Onto the Sea Wall. My three page 1 videos shows it is a dream route.

Passing no properties.

----------

Simple.

Have you got a photo or map of the rear of head street to prove this?

[Adam]

It is 1 minute

Agree it is a short journey to the Sea Wall entrance.

But passing a lot of properties on Head & Fish Street.

The back garden route passes zero properties.

[Adam]

Have you got a photo or map of the rear of head street to prove this?

Google maps.

[ILB]

If access was hard, get hedge trimmers out.

It is called preparation.

Hedgetrimmers?

Just wheel the bike down at 2am.

Hardly going go get people jumping out of bed.

[Adam]

Hedgetrimmers?

Just wheel the bike down at 2am.

Hardly going go get people jumping out of bed.

Depends on the individual.

I would go via the back garden and adjoining field.

You would cycle up Head and Fish Street.

As usual, options for him.

[Adam]

Source from Wilkes at trial on the sea wall. Arlidge puts a simple question about the sea wall to Bamber met with a denial.

To be honest I can't recall when reading the cross examination transcript a sea wall reference but Wilkes is recalling it was there. Its short and Arlidge goes on to the next question.

So Bamber did deny the sea wall.

He denies 12 different things in that extract. Entrance, shooting, removal of silencer, exit.

So no surprise he denied cycling The Sea Wall.