Why no Julie 10pm call mention in JBs first WS?

[ILB]

Do you not believe Bamber spoke about Julie's WS at all beforehand?

He had several hours to.

No, as both of their first initial WS don't both mention the 10pm call. Just JMs

[Adam]

A phone ringing at 3.00am in a house of 5 people, you will get different reactions.

Three people did not check there clocks.

Two people did check their clocks and gave similar times.

[ILB]

A phone ringing at 3.00am in a house of 5 people, you will get different reactions.

Three people did not check there clocks.

Two people did check their clocks  and gave similar times.

It took Battersby 13 days to produce a 2nd WS that included information that should have been included in the first.

It was either forgotten or cooked up.

[Adam]

No, as both of their first initial WS don't both mention the 10pm call. Just JMs

Bamber wouldn't tell her to omit it.

Wouldn't consider it important. She may refuse anyway as it was a 20 minute call.

He may have told her to tone it down.

[ILB]

309. Joanne Woad first made a statement on 16 September. In that statement she said that she thought the time was about 2 a.m.

[ILB]

Woad later changed the time in a later statement to between 2am and 2.59.

[Adam]

It took Battersby 13 days to produce a 2nd WS that included information that should have been included in the first.

It was either forgotten or cooked up.

Do you agree a 3.00am call is within the 30 minute period where Bamber had to shower, change, wash clothes & eat?

[ILB]

Bamber wouldn't tell her to omit it.

Wouldn't consider it important. She may refuse anyway as it was a 20 minute call.

He may have told her to tone it down.

He doesn't mention calling her. She mentions the call.

[Adam]

He doesn't mention calling her. She mentions the call.

Won't free Bamber.

[ILB]

Do you agree a 3.00am call is within the 30 minute period where Bamber had to shower, change, wash clothes & eat?

I'm looking at this from the neutral perspective. I am on the fence. You are a guilter.

[ILB]

Won't free Bamber.

Never claimed it would.

But it certainly means he wasn't trying to mirror their statements.

[Adam]

Woad later changed the time in a later statement to between 2am and 2.59.

Always said her clock said 2 something. She did not check the minutes.

Would have been very near to 3.00am.

[Adam]

Never claimed it would.

But it certainly means he wasn't trying to mirror their statements.

Why would he?

A 23 page WS is what he wouldn't want.

[Adam]

I'm looking at this from the neutral perspective. I am on the fence. You are a guilter.

Do you agree a 3.00am call is within the 30 minute period where Bamber had to shower, change, wash clothes & eat?

[ILB]

Always said her clock said 2 something. She did not check the minutes.

Would have been very near to 3.00am.

In her first WS 16.9.85 she said 2AM. On the dot.

To me, you look at a clock. You see a time. You stick by the time.

No rounding up or down 2.15 3am 3.06. They claim they saw the time  so much so they went to testify at court in a trial a year later.

To me it's all cooked up, but appreciate you find it gospel.