the-doc-maker blog.

[Jonathan]

And of course we can all believe what Julie says. After all who wouldn't brag about killing two 6 year old kids.

He said he'd paid someone else to kill them

[ILB]

He said he'd paid someone else to kill them

Risky as fuck bringing someone's name into it.

Bamber according to Julie was professing him self as a potential solo killer for months before, why he'd mention someone else to " Soften the blow" Doesn't make sense.

Either way he still spearheaded and organised it.

[ILB]

If anything if Bamber would have used a proxy it would be a nameless person.

Not someone Julie Mugford was aware of.

[Jane]

Although in a long term relationship would never entertain internet dating.

Mate of mine saw a women off one of those tinder sites, she ended up stalking him and turning up to his work place.

Didn't need to have met on line for that to have happened. I know as many successful matches which started online, as those which started conventionally. It's the luck of the draw.

[Jonathan]

If anything if Bamber would have used a proxy it would be a nameless person.

Not someone Julie Mugford was aware of.

Clearly it was for her consumption only - he didn't expect her to go to the police - so what did it matter if someone else was blamed? She told the same thing to other people before going to the police.

The hitman story gives her statements a ring of truth - if it was vindictive lies why not just say Bamber said he did it?

[ILB]

Clearly it was for her consumption only - he didn't expect her to go to the police - so what did it matter if someone else was blamed? She told the same thing to other people before going to the police.

The hitman story gives her statements a ring of truth - if it was vindictive lies why not just say Bamber said he did it?

The hitman story on a stand alone point is just an allegation from Julie Mugford which was not verifiable.

[ILB]

Didn't need to have met on line for that to have happened. I know as many successful matches which started online, as those which started conventionally. It's the luck of the draw.

I lost 

[Jonathan]

The hitman story on a stand alone point is just an allegation from Julie Mugford which was not verifiable.

Exactly. Why would she make up a story that could be disproved? And in fact was disproved?

[ILB]

Exactly. Why would she make up a story that could be disproved? And in fact was disproved?

The cold hard facts of it is that people make bullshit up. On the flip side this doesn't mean it didn't happen. But because MM had an alibi it put it to bed.

Jeremy will always claim because she was jilted.

Julie said " She was clearing her conscience "

[Rob_]

The hitman story on a stand alone point is just an allegation from Julie Mugford which was not verifiable.

My main problem with Julie is I would expect her to have lots of little bits of circumstantial but taken together damming evidence.

But there is nothing.

[ILB]

My main problem with Julie is I would expect her to have lots of little bits of circumstantial but taken together damming evidence.

But there is nothing.

I would have expected Bamber if he had used a hitman as proxy to have not named the person to Julie.

Roping in a guy he knew could just cause him problems. Even if he didnt think she would go to the police. People gossip if word ever got round too risky.

[Jonathan]

The cold hard facts of it is that people make bullshit up. On the flip side this doesn't mean it didn't happen. But because MM had an alibi it put it to bed.

Jeremy will always claim because she was jilted.

Julie said " She was clearing her conscience "

Julie flew in on standby for the 2002 Appeal - but was not called

[ILB]

Julie flew in on standby for the 2002 Appeal - but was not called

For me I always believe Julie was much more involved with the whole affair then what is made out.

She was only good as a utilisation tool for EP because Jeremy was denying his guilt. Have always suspected Ainsley etc suspected she was much more on board and involved than she really was.

With this in mind even with Jeremy Bamber being convicted, her WS are totally self serving and may not portray the real background she claims.

We will never find out Jeremy could never highlight it because it would scupper him.

[Steve_uk]

Risky as fuck bringing someone's name into it.

Bamber according to Julie was professing him self as a potential solo killer for months before, why he'd mention someone else to " Soften the blow" Doesn't make sense.

Either way he still spearheaded and organised it.

It makes sense because Julie never pressed him on the subject; it all came from Jeremy. Post-murders Julie began to ask questions.

[ILB]

It makes sense because Julie never pressed him on the subject; it all came from Jeremy. Post-murders Julie began to ask questions.

We've got no idea how it all manifested.

I tend to believe that Julie Mugford in girly chat would have confided in Susan Battersby pre 7.8.85, if only to say " Jeremy comes out with bizzare weird things "

Of course if she wasn't on board with Jeremy.