Silencer: If Sheila's blood was planted what about David & Pamela's blood group?

[snow66!]

NB sustained 4 gunshot wounds in the kitchen with only 3 casings recovered.

Thanks Cutie!
So why didn't SOCO search the buckets for it?

[snow66!]

Oh, so it's missing FROM the Kitchen and not Missing in the Kitchen.

I am not the best with grammar HB!

[Hardy Boy]

It would be interesting to upload the trial transcripts to various AI models and see what feedback they give.

I think this would be a Mamouth task for someone?  Imagine missing one piece and it could throw the results, plus we don't have everything on here and Bambers trial transcript in Court is missing.

[Hardy Boy]

I am not the best with grammar HB!

No Problem, it just had me thinking that's all?

[Cambridgecutie]

Thanks Cutie!
So why didn't SOCO search the buckets for it?

No Marigolds?  Didn't think it was important?  They are very tiny.  It might just have been swept/vacuumed up.  And the kitchen doesn't look fitted by today's standards so might well have slipped down a side/back.  Maybe send Bill round to have a look for it.

[snow66!]

No Marigolds?  Didn't think it was important?  They are very tiny.  It might just have been swept/vacuumed up.  And the kitchen doesn't look fitted by today's standards so might well have slipped down a side/back.  Maybe send Bill round to have a look for it.

You misunderstand what I am getting at Cutie!
I am not really interested in what happened to the casing, I want to know why SOCO ignored the buckets?
What was in the buckets anyway?

[Cambridgecutie]

You misunderstand what I am getting at Cutie!
I am not really interested in what happened to the casing, I want to know why SOCO ignored the buckets?
What was in the buckets anyway?

Why not?  It does hold some importance. 

I don't know if/why SOCO ignored the buckets.  According to AE wit stat they contained stained and grubby clothing which had been left to soak.  May I suggest you familiarise yourself with the case documents.

[snow66!]

Why not?  It does hold some importance. 

I don't know if/why SOCO ignored the buckets.  According to AE wit stat they contained stained and grubby clothing which had been left to soak.  May I suggest you familiarise yourself with the case documents.

Thanks Cutie, but yes again I have some idea of the details in the case documents!
I know exactly what AE claimed was in the buckets!
And again your reply answers the question I had in mind, 'according to AE'!,
This was of course in her second statement once Vanezis had confirmed it was Sheila's time of the month!
I wonder if the buckets were mentioned by anyone who entered WHF on the day of the murders in the murder/suicide investigation?

[Cambridgecutie]

Thanks Cutie, but yes again I have some idea of the details in the case documents!
I know exactly what AE claimed was in the buckets!
And again your reply answers the question I had in mind, 'according to AE'!,
This was of course in her second statement once Vanezis had confirmed it was Sheila's time of the month!
I wonder if the buckets were mentioned by anyone who entered WHF on the day of the murders in the murder/suicide investigation?

You seem to be placing importance on the contents of the buckets?

I believe the buckets are mentioned in an officers stat from firearms. 

[snow66!]

You seem to be placing importance on the contents of the buckets?

I believe the buckets are mentioned in an officers stat from firearms.

Thanks Cutie,I will take a look!
The TFG statements you say?
By the way,the question should be, why did AE place so much importance on the contents of the buckets?
In fact, why did she see a need to mention the buckets at all in her second statement?

[snow66!]

You seem to be placing importance on the contents of the buckets?

I believe the buckets are mentioned in an officers stat from firearms.

I cant see any mention of the buckets in the TFG statements Cutie!
I will check out others statements who entered that morning!