0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bamber & his supporters will agree he spoke in a negative way about his family to Julie during there 18 months. It is pointless denying it as he even used to slate his family to MM! He has always denied speaking about murdering them. The problem here is Julie's WS has a lot of information regarding the massacre she could have only got from Bamber.
But what is your overiding point even if he did ?He himself states in police interviews he had a rough and smooth relationship with June.Parents and kids at loggerheads is not an abnormal thing.
A triple problem for Bamber - Yes I spoke to Julie & Mary about my family in a negative way. Julie's WS is correct here. No I didn't speak to Julie about the massacre. This part of her WS is not true. I cannot explain how Julie's WS has information on the massacre she could only have got from me.
Julie got things wrong about the massacre Adam,haven't you read the whole article?
But he never elucidated further. Too many "no comment" answers for my liking.
I never saw the relatives as all " sweetness and light" we are just people at the end of the day. It is what it is. As Jane has pointed out they were a monetary orientated family. There's evidence of PE up to shady dealings at N J Bamber post Jeremy's conviction ( BW allegations)Whether monetary interest in this case was enough to try and put an innocent man away for life in not sure to be honest. However I get the impression that Nevill was not fond of them. Don't know why.
I find those words from DB very telling. Ann Eaton is a very Machiavellian character.
If one can murder five innocent people for x amount of money, then you can frame one innocent person for the same amount. In 2001 when the FSS visited the scene, there was still Junes blood visibly on the lampshade by the bed that Ann Eaton now sleeps at. She is probably a sociopath or something of that nature.
Yes she said Nevill was shot 7 times. Bamber probably lost count himself in all the excitement.
