« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13   Go Down

Author Topic: The New Yorker article  (Read 10618 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #60 on: July 29, 2024, 11:36:PM »
Regarding there other crimes, obviously robbing the caravan site again was not an option.

Bamber would be disinherited, sacked and told to move out of Nevill's cottage.

Ditto any other crime against the family.

Besides which doubtful Nevill would leave cash there again.

There was only one option.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2024, 11:37:PM by Adam »
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3358
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #61 on: July 29, 2024, 11:42:PM »
Quote from: Roch on July 29, 2024, 11:33:PM
This wasn't at 6.09, it was not long before then?

That is because it would have taken time to trace the call and then deciding what was the best way to play it in the circumstances.
Logged

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #62 on: July 29, 2024, 11:44:PM »
Quote from: Adam on July 29, 2024, 11:36:PM
Regarding there other crimes, obviously robbing the caravan site again was not an option.

Bamber would be disinherited, sacked and told to move out of Nevill's cottage.

Ditto any other crime against the family.

Besides which doubtful Nevill would leave cash there again.

There was only one option.

You have no evidence he burnt down the shop though

Dennis wager ( who didn't like Bamber either ) says that an alternative person was responsible

Regarding the caravan break in. The key prosecution witness in my eyes was just as complicit and shared the spoils.
« Last Edit: July 29, 2024, 11:45:PM by ILB »
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3358
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #63 on: July 29, 2024, 11:45:PM »
Quote from: Bubo bubo on July 29, 2024, 11:42:PM
That is because it would have taken time to trace the call and then deciding what was the best way to play it in the circumstances.
MT posted this.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11149.msg516685.html#msg516685
Logged

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #64 on: July 29, 2024, 11:49:PM »
Quote from: Bubo bubo on July 29, 2024, 11:42:PM
That is because it would have taken time to trace the call and then deciding what was the best way to play it in the circumstances.

They couldn't trace the call back in 1985! You're adding stuff that isn't being claimed.
Logged

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #65 on: July 29, 2024, 11:52:PM »
Quote from: Zoso on July 29, 2024, 11:49:PM
They couldn't trace the call back in 1985! You're adding stuff that isn't being claimed.

Always wonder why we as a developed nation lagged behind in this aspect.

America was doing it years before
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #66 on: July 29, 2024, 11:52:PM »
Quote from: ILB on July 29, 2024, 11:44:PM
You have no evidence he burnt down the shop though

Dennis wager ( who didn't like Bamber either ) says that an alternative person was responsible

Regarding the caravan break in. The key prosecution witness in my eyes was just as complicit and shared the spoils.

Yes Julie and Bamber were aware of each others crimes - cheque book/caravan.

Do you agree with the judge that Bamber would trust Julie enough to talk to her about the massacre?
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #67 on: July 29, 2024, 11:54:PM »
Quote from: ILB on July 29, 2024, 11:52:PM
Always wonder why we as a developed nation lagged behind in this aspect.

America was doing it years before

It wasn't easy for the US to trace calls back then either.
Logged

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #68 on: July 29, 2024, 11:55:PM »
Quote from: Adam on July 29, 2024, 11:52:PM
Yes Julie and Bamber were aware of each others crimes - cheque book/caravan.

Do you agree with the judge that Bamber would trust Julie enough to talk to her about the massacre?

Neither here or there. Bamber denies murder.

Reference the caravan break in. Do you believe Julie enjoyed the spoils with no hesitation ?
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #69 on: July 29, 2024, 11:56:PM »
Quote from: Zoso on July 29, 2024, 11:54:PM
It wasn't easy for the US to trace calls back then either.

In 1977 a call from the then unidentified serial killer BTk was traced to a phonebox.

Merely minutes after, the phone was found hanging off the cradle.

« Last Edit: July 29, 2024, 11:57:PM by ILB »
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #70 on: July 29, 2024, 11:58:PM »
Quote from: ILB on July 29, 2024, 11:55:PM
Neither here or there. Bamber denies murder.

Reference the caravan break in. Do you believe Julie enjoyed the spoils with no hesitation ?

Do you agree with the judge that Bamber would trust Julie enough to talk to her about the massacre?

As a student I'm sure Julie enjoyed any meal Bamber bought her.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #71 on: July 29, 2024, 11:59:PM »
Quote from: Adam on July 29, 2024, 11:52:PM
Yes Julie and Bamber were aware of each others crimes - cheque book/caravan.

Do you agree with the judge that Bamber would trust Julie enough to talk to her about the massacre?

Cheque book? That was battersby and Julie.

Bamber may have joked over them doing it, but that's a crime they themselves did.
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #72 on: July 30, 2024, 12:02:AM »
Quote from: Adam on July 29, 2024, 11:58:PM
Do you agree with the judge that Bamber would trust Julie enough to talk to her about the massacre?

As a student I'm sure Julie enjoyed any meal Bamber bought her.

Certainly enjoyed a Chinese meal and Amsterdam, pevensey and Eastbourne

Until he didn't want to continue it

I think he was genuinely fond of her though.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2024, 12:03:AM by ILB »
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #73 on: July 30, 2024, 12:04:AM »
Have always believed from the gulit perspective they were in league.
Logged
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #74 on: July 30, 2024, 12:05:AM »
Quote from: ILB on July 29, 2024, 11:56:PM
In 1977 a call from the then unidentified serial killer BTk was traced to a phonebox.

Merely minutes after, the phone was found hanging off the cradle.

Don't know anything about him and can't find anything about the call?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »