Re: Julie Mugford Trial examination/cross examination

[Adam]

You keep saying " Bamber felt safe "

Safe from what ?

If anything if gulity it was the relatives he should have been watching like a hawk from his perspective

Safe from being a suspect.

He had told the relatives nothing.

[Jane]

Ah yes,you are quite right HB,although wasn't that deal made before JB was convicted and indeed on the condition that he was convicted?
Been nothing since though has there?

So supporters want us to believe, Snow. However, such remains to be proved.

[ILB]

Safe from being a suspect.

He had told the relatives nothing.

You honestly think that you could tell someone that information and ever be safe?

[Adam]

You honestly think that you could tell someone that information and ever be safe?

Well he thought he was safe. But was wrong.

[ILB]

Well he thought he was safe. But was wrong.

It's bullshit.

No idiot would do what Bamber did in reference to Julie. It's bollocks

[Adam]

It's bullshit.

No idiot would do what Bamber did in reference to Julie. It's bollocks

They were together for 18 months. Before & after the massacre.

Julie wouldn't dare perjure herself on something so serious.

Over 200 pieces of forensic/circumstantial evidence confirm Bamber's guilt and validates Julie's WS/testimony.

[snow66!]

So supporters want us to believe, Snow. However, such remains to be proved.

What? The deal with the News of the world  Jane? Not sure what was decided!

[Jane]

What? The deal with the News of the world  Jane? Not sure what was decided!

You missed my point, Snow. What happened isn't the question. It's when it happened. As I said, supporters want us to believe it was dependent on Julie arranging for JB to be convicted. Actually, such is laughable when You think about it,isn't it?

[ILB]

Over 200 pieces of forensic/circumstantial evidence confirm Bamber's guilt and validates Julie's WS/testimony.

Again bullshit

[Adam]

Again bullshit

It is all sourced evidence.

You are entitled to support Bamber if you want him to put one over on the justice system. But only the silencer is disputed.

[Adam]

There is obviously more than 200 pieces of incriminating evidence.

People involved in the case will have more.

Posters can just go by online WS's, documents & court judgements.

[ILB]

It is all sourced evidence.

You are entitled to support Bamber if you want him to put one over on the justice system. But only the silencer is disputed.

Jez is innocent I believe and time will tell in due course.

[snow66!]

You missed my point, Snow. What happened isn't the question. It's when it happened. As I said, supporters want us to believe it was dependent on Julie arranging for JB to be convicted. Actually, such is laughable when You think about it,isn't it?

Ah,you mean some people claim Julie lied for the money Jane? Yes,I agree that is laughable.
Besides,I believe the police were mainly responsible for Julie's statements and trial evidence.
What I believe is that Julie, and Sue for that matter,said what the police wanted them to say in order to save their own skin.

[Adam]

Jez is innocent I believe and time will tell in due course.

There is no evidence he is innocent.

[Jane]

Ah,you mean some people claim Julie lied for the money Jane? Yes,I agree that is laughable.
Besides,I believe the police were mainly responsible for Julie's statements and trial evidence.
What I believe is that Julie, and Sue for that matter,said what the police wanted them to say in order to save their own skin.

Oh! Right! You're saying a 21 year old girl is entirely responsible for JB's conviction?