Barbara De"ath discussing sea wall

[Cambridgecutie]

Adam, I know you are pro police ( until you are arrested) but I would be interested on your opinion on this chaps comment, ( undeneath the unbiased ex met detective Peter Bleksley )

Jeremy Bamber has been faking evidence for the last 40 years. Easily provable lies, and you post a comment from an unknown person ranting and frothing at the mouth, and you expect people to take that comment seriously.

Stick to the known facts.  Jeremy Bamber has been creating lies for the past 40 years and presenting those lies as new evidence.

Those lies are easily proved as lies, even to a member of the public.  And the CCRC summarized 8 years of submission and subsequent investigations as 'pure speculation and unsubstantiated allegations'

The CCRC basically labelled him a liar.

[Adam]

No I don't.

Do you believe open areas do not produce ambient light and Phillip, GG & RB were wrong.

[ILB]

Jeremy Bamber has been faking evidence for the last 40 years. Easily provable lies, and you post a comment from an unknown person ranting and frothing at the mouth, and you expect people to take that comment seriously.

Stick to the known facts.  Jeremy Bamber has been creating lies for the past 40 years and presenting those lies as new evidence.

Those lies are easily proved as lies, even to a member of the public.  And the CCRC summarized 8 years of submission and subsequent investigations as 'pure speculation and unsubstantiated allegations'

The CCRC basically labelled him a liar.

Thanks for that.

But I'm expected at the same time to take couples from Surrey and biased pro gulit ( no longer live ) blogs?

No thank you killingeve

But at the same time can you prove the person in the comment is a liar? But my comment was directed at Adam, not you.

[ILB]

Do you believe open areas do not produce ambient light and Phillip, GG & RB were wrong.

What time did Philip visit ?

I've discredited GG

What did RB say

Thanks

[ILB]

Think both killingeve and Adam have wasted their time?

Why dedicate your time to a case where the individual is never getting out, not even looking at the case from an on the fence stance.

Wouldnt flower arranging be more productive ?

[Adam]

Thanks for that.

But I'm expected at the same time to take couples from Surrey and biased pro gulit ( no longer live ) blogs?

No thank you killingeve

But at the same time can you prove the person in the comment is a liar? But my comment was directed at Adam, not you.

Why do you think GG's blog was biased?

Is it because he wrote 'the ambient light made it so easy to see'?

[Adam]

What time did Philip visit ?

I've discredited GG

What did RB say

Thanks

You need a reason to discard GG. Not just because he says something you don't like.

Phillip and Yvonne visited during the day.

Phillip knows there would be light at night as it is an open area.

[ILB]

Why do you think GG's blog was biased?

Is it because he wrote 'the ambient light made it so easy to see'?

I believe he was pro guilt

[ILB]

You need a reason to discard GG. Not just because he says something you don't like.

Phillip and Yvonne visited during the day.

Phillip knows there would be light at night as it is an open area.

GG used night vision goggles, I don't think much more needs to be said about this individual.

You confirm Phillip visited in the day.

Thanks Adam.

[Adam]

GG used night vision goggles, I don't think much more needs to be said about this individual.

You confirm Phillip visited in the day.

Thanks Adam.

Please don't mention night vision goggles. You do yourself no credit.

I agreed Bamber had the option of using a bike light or helmet light. Which were easy to purchase.

Do you not agree with Phillip that open areas would have good ambient light?

[Rob_]

Please don't mention night vision goggles. You do yourself no credit.

I agreed Bamber had the option of using a bike light or helmet light. Which were easy to purchase.

Do you not agree with Phillip that open areas would have good ambient light?

Where is this ambient light coming from Adam?

The Moon that night assuming a totally clear sky would be around 0.06 lux (probably less) a single streetlight would be around 6 lux. So the illumination from the Moon would be over 100 times less that a typical streetlight.

Oh by the way I like your photos of the blue hour you posted, shame they were not taken during total darkness.

[Adam]

Where is this ambient light coming from Adam?

The Moon that night assuming a totally clear sky would be around 0.06 lux (probably less) a single streetlight would be around 6 lux. So the illumination from the Moon would be over 100 times less that a typical streetlight.

Oh by the way I like your photos of the blue hour you posted, shame they were not taken during total darkness.

My pleasure. It was over 100 photos. Which show ambient light on farm land.

Believe ILB believes if there is no artificial lighting people can't see past there own nose. Although Goldhanger & TD has no artificial lighting.

[ILB]

Please don't mention night vision goggles. You do yourself no credit.

I agreed Bamber had the option of using a bike light or helmet light. Which were easy to purchase.

Do you not agree with Phillip that open areas would have good ambient light?

I stand by my assessment on GG. Whether you think it's creditable or not.

I don't believe I can draw comparison between what Philip says and the facts of the case.

Day and night

[Rob_]

My pleasure. It was over 100 photos. Which show ambient light on farm land.

Believe ILB believes if there is no artificial lighting people can't see past there own nose. Although Goldhanger & TD has no artificial lighting.

Could you give me the exposure and ISO times you used? I take blue hour photos and the data would be useful.

Thanks.

[ILB]

Believe only a time applicable to the time Jeremy Bamber did the journey can assess the sea wall.

A day time stroll serves no purpose