Barbara De"ath discussing sea wall

[Adam]

Nobody is going to hear or see a car at that time.

Pissing around on a ladies bike over s darkened track and fields

It's laughable it's ludicrous

Just takes one person out of 90 or one security camera from 45 properties. Or both.

But appreciate you are more reckless.

[Hardy Boy]

Past around 45 properties. Just takes one person.

Not worth the risk when there is a 100% safe route which had good flat terrain. Wouldn't be tiring for him.

Perfect Terrain for a sit up and beg Ladies Cycle in the early hours of the Morning

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18874;image

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18873;image

No wonder Julie never saw the bike again at Goldhanger, i bet he thought Sod that for a game of Soldiers?

[Jane]

Imagine what Bamber would feel like if Julie had not come forward & Taff stayed on the case. But....

Someone saw him drive off/or arrive back.

Talk about kicking yourself.

If anyone had seen him at the time that would incriminate him, it might have saved Julie from coming forward?

[Adam]

Perfect Terrain for a sit up and beg Ladies Cycle in the early hours of the Morning

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18874;image

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=18873;image

No wonder Julie never saw the bike again at Goldhanger, i bet he thought Sod that for a game of Soldiers?

Too risky driving. Just takes one security camera or person.

Too much of an open goal to the defence if the prosecution said he drove.

[ILB]

Too risky driving. Just takes one security camera or person.

Too much of an open goal to the defence if the prosecution said he drove.

He went to meet the police in the car nobody saw him.

Bews stating that Bambers car was the only other car on the road.

Bike is a clever narrative.

But not realistic. But from a prosecution point of view very good.

[Adam]

The prosecution saying he walked across fields would be challenged by the defence. As it was a long walk which would be tiring.

The jury would say he was prepared to do the walk as a one off for over 500k.

[ILB]

It's literally a 16 minute round trip drive.

[Adam]

The prosecution saying he walked across fields would be challenged by the defence. As it was a long walk which would be tiring.

The jury would say he was prepared to do the walk as a one off for over 500k.

I would!

[Adam]

With the walk across fields narrative bullet proof, the prosecution decided he cycled. Don't blame them!

The cycle ride was quicker, less tiring, a bike had arrived & Julie testified he planned to.

A dream for the prosecution.

[ILB]

I would!

I wouldn't kill my family for money. But each to their own.

[ILB]

With the walk across fields narrative bullet proof, the prosecution decided he cycled. Don't blame them!

The cycle ride was quicker, less tiring, a bike had arrived & Julie testified he planned to.

A dream for the prosecution.

Well why are Bamber and the CT saying the prosecution narrative is he walked then cycled back ?

Is he now claiming the bike wasn't at bourtree at all?

[Adam]

I wouldn't kill my family for money. But each to their own.

I would walk a few miles to avoid properties for 500k. Rather than drive because 'it's quicker'.

But appreciate you are more reckless. 

[Adam]

The defence would say 'no one saw him walking'.

As with the cycle ride this would not influence the jury. As a 2am walk passed no properties.

[ILB]

I could literally now drive to the corner shop down the road in daylight and none of my neighbours would notice!!!!

[Adam]

Well why are Bamber and the CT saying the prosecution narrative is he walked then cycled back ?

Is he now claiming the bike wasn't at bourtree at all?

No idea. He had the chance to refute Julie saying the bike arrived at Goldhanger just before the massacre during his police interviews & trial.

He didn't.