Author Topic: latest update  (Read 243 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
latest update
« on: March 21, 2024, 06:10:PM »
latest update from sandra  https://youtu.be/0AjFFKxvH-U

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18027
Re: latest update
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2024, 05:20:PM »
latest update from sandra  https://youtu.be/0AjFFKxvH-U
I watched this last night. Sandra is a woman of conviction, very hard to take a dislike to. She looks pale, tired, fatigued. The main issue I have with the video is that she cannot or will not disclose the new information she has garnered or her sources. I understand the constraints she is under, but it all seems shrouded in mystery.

One does, at times with her, forget temporarily that one is dealing with a convicted murderer.

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4020
Re: latest update
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2024, 08:01:PM »
I watched this last night. Sandra is a woman of conviction, very hard to take a dislike to. She looks pale, tired, fatigued. The main issue I have with the video is that she cannot or will not disclose the new information she has garnered or her sources. I understand the constraints she is under, but it all seems shrouded in mystery.

One does, at times with her, forget temporarily that one is dealing with a convicted murderer.
She seems to be talking about different lawyers looking at various things from different angles Steve.Mainly about testing the samples I think!

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18027
Re: latest update
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2024, 05:20:PM »
She seems to be talking about different lawyers looking at various things from different angles Steve.Mainly about testing the samples I think!
I don't doubt that she is acting in good faith. We'll have to wait and see.

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4020
Re: latest update
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2024, 09:22:PM »
I don't doubt that she is acting in good faith. We'll have to wait and see.
Oh well,the parole board will apparently be making a decision shortly Steve,once the twenty years is uo.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18027
Re: latest update
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2024, 09:46:PM »
Oh well,the parole board will apparently be making a decision shortly Steve,once the twenty years is uo.
She mentions Angela Constance at one point. I think the inference is the Parole Board is not impartial. She also mentioned the Bamber case at 48.00, which gave me a less favourable opinion of her somewhat.

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4020
Re: latest update
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2024, 10:11:PM »
She mentions Angela Constance at one point. I think the inference is the Parole Board is not impartial. She also mentioned the Bamber case at 48.00, which gave me a less favourable opinion of her somewhat.
Maybe she has heard about the Aga marks Steve! Clever woman!

Online nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16852
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: latest update
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2024, 12:52:PM »

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4020
Re: latest update
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2024, 09:04:PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKoGwjtlPXs
Thanks nugnug.Nothing that we haven't really heard before though.Just a case of keep spreading the word to a wider audience ie,.world wide!

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18027
« Last Edit: March 31, 2024, 09:11:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4020
Re: latest update
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2024, 10:51:PM »
Sandra has worked so hard. The least they could have given her was a review. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/9987225/prosecutors-reject-for-review-luke-mitchell/
Well you heaard what Dr Lean said Steve,that the Advocate said the police did a sterling job and there was no need for a review! We have to remember of course that the Advocate Dorothy bain is married to the man who prosecuted LM in court. Oh well,the petition has over 30 thousand signatures now Steve as you know.