Wow! I never knew this.

[handymanz]

In a murder trial, you would expect the jury to be paying attention to the evidence. In Jeremy’s case he was convicted on a 10-2 majority verdict, he only needed one more juror to vote not guilty to be acquitted. Below shows concerns that a juror was asleep during proceedings!

Or would it have meant a hung Jury, requiring a subsequent re- trial.

[Bubo bubo]

Or would it have meant a hung Jury, requiring a subsequent re- trial.

I have seen reports of this in a post but have never seen this evidence before. If you search juror asleep you will find 12 references

[Zoso]

So, it doesn't say he was asleep, even Rivlin didn't think he was asleep!

[ILB]

If he was nodding off only thing I could think would happen is a severe bollocking from the judge

[Zoso]

If he was nodding off only thing I could think would happen is a severe bollocking from the judge

It doesn't say he was nodding off or asleep and even Bambers lawyer didn't think he was.

[Steve_uk]

It's an old story: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=5014.0

[Zoso]

It's an old story: https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=5014.0

It is but it seems the story changed from a juror closing his eyes now and again, to he was definitely asleep. It doesn't seem like that was the case at all.