Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85

[Caroline]

I was thinking the other day that Jeremy never claimed that his father did call the police , because he would not have known if he did . But I think the fact that he said he called back and the line was engaged and then the transcripts later might have convinced him it had happened . But even if Neville did not call the police the one call that would prove that Jeremy was innocent is the call from his father to him. If that was on the records somewhere it would prove his innocence .

There is no record, those old exchanges didn't record anything, there was no equipment that could store information. It worked much like an electric meter.

[Jan]

There is no record, those old exchanges didn't record anything, there was no equipment that could store information. It worked much like an electric meter.

Yes so you have said before . So when the police said to Jeremy they knew a call had been made from the farm to him you would have thought he would have have been shocked then? They then used the hitman theory to explain the call .

And how do you explain the document posted that said the police did have a list of calls ?


.

[guest2181]

Yes so you have said before . So when the police said to Jeremy they knew a call had been made from the farm to him you would have thought he would have have been shocked then? They then used the hitman theory to explain the call .

And how do you explain the document posted that said the police did have a list of calls ?


.

Which document Jan?

I don't believe I've seen where the police said that to JB, where is that?

[Caroline]

Yes so you have said before . So when the police said to Jeremy they knew a call had been made from the farm to him you would have thought he would have have been shocked then? They then used the hitman theory to explain the call .

And how do you explain the document posted that said the police did have a list of calls ?


.

I have had all this with Lookout, if you don't believe me, spend the next few weeks researching the Maldon exchange and you will see there was no way to record calls. I even tracked down an engineer who worked at the Maldon exchange at the time. It's why you shouldn't take notice of stuff people say on the forum and do your own research - always works best for me. 

[lookout]

I have had all this with Lookout, if you don't believe me, spend the next few weeks researching the Maldon exchange and you will see there was no way to record calls. I even tracked down an engineer who worked at the Maldon exchange at the time. It's why you shouldn't take notice of stuff people say on the forum and do your own research - always works best for me.

That's why I don't take any notice of you. You fell for that one,didn't you ?

[Jan]

Which document Jan?

I don't believe I've seen where the police said that to JB, where is that?

Apologies they said it to Mathew , but I knew they said the call had been made and could be verified . So the police were telling porky pies then?

[Jan]

See attached

[guest2181]

Apologies they said it to Mathew , but I knew they said the call had been made and could be verified . So the police were telling porky pies then?

Sorry Jan, I wasn't calling you out, I just hadn't read what you'd posted, that's all.

[Jan]

I have had all this with Lookout, if you don't believe me, spend the next few weeks researching the Maldon exchange and you will see there was no way to record calls. I even tracked down an engineer who worked at the Maldon exchange at the time. It's why you shouldn't take notice of stuff people say on the forum and do your own research - always works best for me.

As I said sorry I believed what the police said. Silly me

[guest2181]

See attached

Thanks Jan.

[Jan]

Thanks Jan.

Thanks . Glad I could find it to be honest . But my brain tends to keep these stupid bits of information for no reason. I just remember everyone saying that the police were telling lies to accuse Matthew . But to me it seemed like they did know there was a call and it was not Jeremy so that had to make a story to cover it up.

[Steve_uk]

Why would they release information about the glove coming off when it was one of the few pieces which hadn't appeared in the newspapers?

[guest2181]

See attached

It's interesting that it says the call would register on a digital apparatus.

[Jan]

It's interesting that it says the call would register on a digital apparatus.

Oh no we might be back to the phones again. If you read Jeremy's statement again the police don't originally say the call did not happen they seem to just say it should not have been his father that called . But Jeremy asks him to check the phone records to prove the call  . So he seems to think they could have checked ? And there were two lines I think one was a business line.

[Caroline]

As I said sorry I believed what the police said. Silly me

You don't have to if you do your own research - sorry for providing the info, which by the way, CAN be verified. Clearly they said it could be checked out because they were trying to trap MM which meakes it clear that believed Julie when she said Bamber told her MM was the hitman.