Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85

[Caroline]

Sorry to butt in.  There is an argument at the moment that a 999 call was made at 06.09.  The Met police got wind of it and went looking for any related evidence in 2002.  I've got my own opinions on this at the moment - still sussing things out. 

However, if such a call was made - Ainsley would have probably ensured the evidence was destroyed.

An argument by who?

[Roch]

An argument by who?

Probably whoever discovered the content of post 133.

[Caroline]

Probably whoever discovered the content of post 133.

That's just a quote, where's the document?

[Roch]

That's just a quote, where's the document?

It's hardly going to be on here.

[Caroline]

It's hardly going to be on here.

Why not? Evidence to show Bamber is innocent is on the forum (allegedly) and people make all kinds of claims here. Why would you be prepared to believe something without seeing the actual doc?

[lookout]

The document that I quoted from re. the open-line was from the 4 murders/suicide investigation,namely,SC/688/85 and was wafted on here not long ago. There won't be many of these docs around as they gave the TRUE facts of what went on on the 7th of August 1985.

[Roch]

Why not? Evidence to show Bamber is innocent is on the forum (allegedly) and people make all kinds of claims here. Why would you be prepared to believe something without seeing the actual doc?

But Caroline - the forum archive is not the be all and end all of source documents. 

What I meant was - if it was within the batch of documents that Mike has - it would already exist on here if Mike had came accross it.  Since it isn't on here - he either hasn't come accross it or it's not in his batch.   

It's not me who's making the claim.

[lookout]

If the truth be known,I don't think EP knew for certain who made that 999 call----but someone did.

[JackieD]

But Caroline - the forum archive is not the be all and end all of source documents. 

What I meant was - if it was within the batch of documents that Mike has - it would already exist on here if Mike had came accross it.  Since it isn't on here - he either hasn't come accross it or it's not in his batch.   

It's not me who's making the claim.

After years on this forum at least you have the satisfaction to know your instincts were right

[Bill Robertson]

If the truth be known,I don't think EP knew for certain who made that 999 call----but someone did.

Given the rigor mortis condition apparent on Nevill and June, I would say that the only person left alive at 06:09 was Sheila.

[Caroline]

But Caroline - the forum archive is not the be all and end all of source documents. 

What I meant was - if it was within the batch of documents that Mike has - it would already exist on here if Mike had came accross it.  Since it isn't on here - he either hasn't come accross it or it's not in his batch.   

It's not me who's making the claim.

Then who is?

[Adam]

Given the rigor mortis condition apparent on Nevill and June, I would say that the only person left alive at 06:09 was Sheila.

Why do you think Sheila killed everyone before 3.48am, then kept herself alive for another 4 hours. Shooting herself in the kitchen, before making her way upstairs (without being seen) after the police had entered WHF ?

It seems a new and just as important question from the Stokechurch investigation is who was Sheila ringing at 6.09am. Her hair dresser ?

Mike says the police shot Sheila, surely the bullets in her neck would prove this. Or was this more forgery from the police ?

[Roch]

Then who is?

Probably the usual suspects 

[lookout]

Given the rigor mortis condition apparent on Nevill and June, I would say that the only person left alive at 06:09 was Sheila.

Yes of course,of that there's no doubt when you point out the RM.

[Caroline]

Probably the usual suspects 

So, you don't know. OK