Ana Justice
@AnaJusticeLM[Name removed]
It's been stated by Mr Forbes and his followers that these details are trivial - actually, I'm finding that some of the fundamental points that convinced me of the guilt of others, weren't even true. That's not trivial, by any means.
6:21 PM ยท Nov 27, 2023
Ok, so this is what I meant about a false narrative in place, the exposure of many lies, which leaves the question, 'If this is what we are discovering here then what else has been manipulated and lied about?' It would seem that both SL and SF's were under the impression, safeguard even, of believing transcripts would never be made public, still under the safeguard of this being the case with statements in full? Attempting repeatedly to try and stop people from obtaining them?
I first started commenting on this case because of lies I knew were in place. I took to studying what had been put out, intricately. Which was never around guilt/innocence. The ludicrous application of some giant conspiracy just to fit LM up. Therefore I set myself a question, an area to study around. Why did suspicion fall upon LM, why could he not be eliminated as suspect in the young girls murder? Realism and not fallacy.
The alibi - If SM, genuinely, within such a short period of time, had complete amnesia from the moment he finished work, then that is what he clearly should have stuck with? Is it really believable however, that someones memory was selective in what was lost? Which was around that crucial time of day. What of his alibi? Was it, that after playing the 'I cannot remember,' did he realise, wait a minute, I am going to need an alibi here also? There we have the birth of the story of them all being together, interacting with each other? Whilst perhaps trying to evade what he had been doing, thinking at first perhaps, my watching porn and masturbating has nothing to do with the young girls murder, but it did, even in its simplest form, he also required an alibi? Strength in numbers?
Compare - If he had no amnesia, why would he have initially played the cannot remember card? Did this show that SM was not wanting directly involved in that alibi for his brother? Wanting to be part of becoming entangled in lying for him, therefore lying by omission instead? He may very well have been aware of far more and wanting nothing to do with it. It doesn't necessarily point towards believing his younger brother had murdered someone, but certainly that he was not home.
All in all, it really is a tangled mess of lies, it doesn't matter which way you swing it - LM was clearly not home at that point. The original alibi ran from 5:05pm until 5:40pm, it was CCTV and phone logs that showed those times to be completely wrong. We have CM arriving home just after 5:15pm, SM's internet session ending at 5:16pm, we have LM saying he had made the call from the wall at the entrance of the estate, first call at 5:32pm. The original alibi around 35mins, evaporated to around 13mins, which did not fit around that evenly spaced out, very relaxed dinner tale.
Porn and masturbating - Does not just take place in an empty house. It does however bring with it awareness. We are conscious to the presence of others, alert to any noise/movement, alert to any risk of being caught/interrupted. What the AD was demonstrating, was that it was never simply that he may not have seen his brother, he had not seen him, nor heard him. Clearly hearing his mother arriving home and ending his internet session. LM claimed to have been listening to music whilst making dinner.
