0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If guilty,I think he would have hidden them ,maybe under floor boards at his cottage or somewhere else that no one would look,then wash them when it was safe to do so.He couldn't leave them at WHF as it would be thoroughly searched,too dodgy,and he wouldn't have wasted time washing them at WHF either.And as Roch said ,he couldn't hide them in the countryside for fear of dogs finding them,also,he knew he would be in the spotlight so very hard to get a chance to retrieve them.No,he had to keep them near by and deal with them when he got the opportunity.
If anything he had too many options. But would have made his decision beforehand and kept to it.
If he just wore a wet suit, he just needed to wash the wet blood off in a shower. He could then leave the wet suit at WHF. Or cycle back in it.
Blood is quite hard to remove, as usual you post something as a fact which is nothing but.
Wet blood from a wet suit will come off easily.
Blood on a wetsuit would be easily detectable with ultraviolet light.
Never heard of a washer/dryer, Roch? I really don't know why we're discussing this. What could possible be more normal that a washing machine doing its thing with dirty clothes? It's not even as if he was a suspect. I'm will to be that when he was such, no one remembered if the washing machine was on in his cottage.
So he murdered everyone, then washed and dried his clothes, then cycled or walked back to his cottage with his clean clothes in tow?
That's not what I said. I've never subscribed to the idea. I believe he threw his soiled clothes in the washing machine when he got back to Bourtree.
What time do you have him arriving home?
No one knows that but it has to be before 03:00am.
Well now? Certainly in time to take an alleged phone call around 3am then spend 20 or so minutes idling away time before calling police. See! He had masses of time to shove his soiled clothes into the washing machine.
