The beauty of THREE marks for supporters

[ILB]

My research is on the forum because that's the point of it. The reason you won't answer is because he clearly didn't bother to reply to you. You're the one who said you would share what he said. The use of caps clearly does hammer the point because you noticed it. I'll repeat my initial post - my post wasn't in response to you - you made a mistake in your reply, you could have just said 'ok' - it saves so much BS!

 I noticed it because I read your response.

You would argue today is Tuesday!

[Zoso]

I noticed it because I read your response.

You would argue today is Tuesday!

The response that wasn't QUOTED TO YOU!

I would argue today was Tuesday, if it was TUESDAY. If someone asked you what day it was, you'd ask them to do their research. It's so much easier to just admit you 'don't know'.

[ILB]

The response that wasn't QUOTED TO YOU!

I would argue today was Tuesday, if it was TUESDAY. If someone asked you what day it was, you'd ask them to do their research. It's so much easier to just admit you 'don't know'.

I know the photo of Shelia and Mabel Speakman is from 1985.

[Zoso]

I know the photo of Shelia and Mabel Speakman is from 1985.

The rest of us don't.

[ILB]

The rest of us don't.

Are you Arthur Scargill now?

[Zoso]

Are you Arthur Scargill now?

Not last time I looked ........ hang on ................. Nope definitely not (phew!!).

[ILB]

Not last time I looked ........ hang on ................. Nope definitely not (phew!!).

I'm not a student in a school, I'm also not carrying out a university assignment, and neither am I writing a true crime bio.  It's a internet forum.

However I know the photograph is from 1985 from my research I have undertaken. If you choose not to believe that. Then that is fine.

Fundamentally it's a picture of Shelia with her grandmother Mabel Speakman.t's not a tool used to promote the innocence of Bamber. It has little value in that regard.

[ILB]

You may be interested to know that Roger Wilkes book provides little or anything in sources. And that's from working in conjecture alongside the convicted man on the book! Although of course it is a none biased book and not an innocent pro one

I actually enjoyed it and prefer it to CALS

[Hardy Boy]

Bamber made the burns.

This is roughly where the Tear was on Neville's PJ's Adam, probably in line with the burns but 2 inch to one side, imagine the PJ's being stretched or misjointed on his back during a struggle, looks big enough to insert an hot object through the hole?  Is it a coincidence?  There was a Poker at the side of the Aga and there was the rifle, two instruments that could have been used?

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=38321;image

[Zoso]

This is roughly where the Tear was on Neville's PJ's Adam, probably in line with the burns but 2 inch to one side, imagine the PJ's being stretched or misjointed on his back during a struggle, looks big enough to insert an hot object through the hole?  Is it a coincidence?  There was a Poker at the side of the Aga and there was the rifle, two instruments that could have been used?

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=38321;image

That's a good point! Boyce used bare pig skin (and could still only manage two burns) but NB was wearing his PJ top!!

[Steve_uk]

This is roughly where the Tear was on Neville's PJ's Adam, probably in line with the burns but 2 inch to one side, imagine the PJ's being stretched or misjointed on his back during a struggle, looks big enough to insert an hot object through the hole?  Is it a coincidence?  There was a Poker at the side of the Aga and there was the rifle, two instruments that could have been used?

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=887.0;attach=38321;image

I think experts have ruled out the poker as having made the marks. The Aga scenario is interesting.

[Zoso]

I'm not a student in a school, I'm also not carrying out a university assignment, and neither am I writing a true crime bio.  It's a internet forum.

However I know the photograph is from 1985 from my research I have undertaken. If you choose not to believe that. Then that is fine.

Fundamentally it's a picture of Shelia with her grandmother Mabel Speakman.t's not a tool used to promote the innocence of Bamber. It has little value in that regard.

It's not a case of believing but not very long ago, you were asking Adam to post proof of someone making the seawall journey at night. If you're not willing to post proof of your own research, then why should anyone else? What kind of reference material would the forum have if everyone just made claims and posted no evidence or sources?

[ILB]

It's not a case of believing but not very long ago, you were asking Adam to post proof of someone making the seawall journey at night. If you're not willing to post proof of your own research, then why should anyone else? What kind of reference material would the forum have if everyone just made claims and posted no evidence or sources?

Adam offered up 1000 sources of people who had supposably cycled the sea wall.

He offered that information not me.

I know it isn't true. So I just asked him to prove all 1000, he in the event just gave one.

You don't accept my photograph. That's fine. Nothing about the photograph proves Jeremy's innocence. It's just a bloody photo of Shelia and Mabel from 85.

[Adam]

It's not a case of believing but not very long ago, you were asking Adam to post proof of someone making the seawall journey at night. If you're not willing to post proof of your own research, then why should anyone else? What kind of reference material would the forum have if everyone just made claims and posted no evidence or sources?

I did post proof. Months ago - Gunfire Graffiti.

ILB says he lied.

RB also says it's easy to see at night.

ILB says RB lied.

[Adam]

Adam offered up 1000 sources of people who had supposably cycled the sea wall.

He offered that information not me.

I know it isn't true. So I just asked him to prove all 1000, he in the event just gave one.

You don't accept my photograph. That's fine. Nothing about the photograph proves Jeremy's innocence. It's just a bloody photo of Shelia and Mabel from 85.

Why has no one ever said the Sea Wall cannot be cycled at night?

Hundreds would have been there over the last 38 years. Interested in or working on the case.

You saying it is dismissed as you have never been there. Day or night.