Baroness Jones of Moulscoomb, House of Lords

[Roch]

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb, House of Lords, asks the Home Office about non-disclosure in the case of Jeremy Bamber

In response to HL1475 - Because Essex police Chief Constable has refused disclosure both to the court, to Jeremy and also to the CCRC we are asking that a higher authority intervene, namely the Justice Minister or Home Secretary responsible for policing but it seems this has been ignored and the Chief Constable doesn't have to be held accountable to the Government.

In response to HL1476 - We have evidence disclosed post 2002 appeal which shows directly that a large amount of material was not disclosed we have specifically identified this in our disclosure booklet and so this cannot be viewed as coming under the Kevin Nunn ruling as 'speculative'. Also we have statements proving that evidence was destroyed by police so that is in direct contrast to the response made by Baroness Williams of Trafford.

[Bubo bubo]

Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb, House of Lords, asks the Home Office about non-disclosure in the case of Jeremy Bamber

In response to HL1475 - Because Essex police Chief Constable has refused disclosure both to the court, to Jeremy and also to the CCRC we are asking that a higher authority intervene, namely the Justice Minister or Home Secretary responsible for policing but it seems this has been ignored and the Chief Constable doesn't have to be held accountable to the Government.

In response to HL1476 - We have evidence disclosed post 2002 appeal which shows directly that a large amount of material was not disclosed we have specifically identified this in our disclosure booklet and so this cannot be viewed as coming under the Kevin Nunn ruling as 'speculative'. Also we have statements proving that evidence was destroyed by police so that is in direct contrast to the response made by Baroness Williams of Trafford.

When were these questions asked?

[Roch]

When were these questions asked?

Probably a few a years ago now Bubo.  There was also a Guardian article in 2017 about non disclosure.

[Zoso]

When were these questions asked?

2017

[Adam]

2017

Is Roch spamming the forum with 6 year old articles?

[Adam]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://lordsbusiness.parliament.uk/ItemOfBusiness%3FitemOfBusinessId%3D38950%26sectionId%3D50%26businessPaperDate%3D2017-09-11&ved=2ahUKEwjrw7iQxdSAAxX_gv0HHc4LAm8QFnoECCEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0Ah-87WGliWYR3_bI9nWh0

It says 'This question has been answered by the relevant Government Department'.

[Steve_uk]

Moulscoomb, pronounced MOLESKOM. Why does the Kevin Nunn ruling not apply? https://www.thejusticegap.com/new-dity-ccrtc/

[Roch]

Is Roch spamming the forum with 6 year old articles?

Doesn't seem that long ago.

[Zoso]

Doesn't seem that long ago.

Since you spammed the forum? It's not, that was just this morning