0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
A bit more Adam:Evidence that the fatal wounds had been fired by a rifle without a silencer are corroborated by further fresh analysis of burn marks on Nevill Bamber's back. The findings are supported by firearms experts working for Dr John Manlove, an Oxfordshire-based forensic scientist.Manlove states: "From its size and shape, this mark could possibly have been caused by the hot muzzle of a firearm, without a sound moderator." He says that further testing is required with the murder weapon, an Anschütz 525 rifle, to underpin his initial assessment.
The silencer was never used in the first place, but two were examined at the labs so we have a huge problem don't we!
The article is about a second sound moderator but the same applies to all of the other claims.
It's not an article, is a court judgement from 2020
I think he was championing for full disclosure of everything. Not just about the second SM
It only mentions the moderator.
If there were 2 SM's at WHF, maybe Bamber just used one of them to commit the massacre!?
The evidence shows it was, whether you believe that or not but two silencers being tested is a CT claim and 'we' know how reliable they are!
If two silencers were examined at WHF Bamber gets a retrial you know this.
Why? One has Sheila's blood, aga paint, a grey hair & a scratch. The other doesn't. Still waiting for your source that 2 were examined.
It also mentions that Bamber. wants access to all the original case files that are withheld. Which Boyce requestsHence disclosure.
