Confirmation June's bike was stolen.

[Adam]

Unless someone can say " I saw Jeremy Bamber steal the bike "

Then his claim remains valid that he borrowed it.

Julie hasn't disputed his borrowing it for her reason.

He borrowed it without telling June.

[Bubo bubo]

He borrowed it without telling June.

You are still doing it. You now agree it was not stolen but are adding crap that you cannot possibly know and again making a statement for which you have no evidence.

I use your phrase. Source please.

[Adam]

You are still doing it. You now agree it was not stolen but are adding crap that you cannot possibly know and again making a statement for which you have no evidence.

I use your phrase. Source please.

Bamber and June were not speaking to each other. Multiple sources available.

Did you purchase a book on the case? Give you a better understanding of it.

Me and ILB recommend Wilkes.

[Bubo bubo]

Bamber and June were not speaking to each other. Multiple sources available.

Did you purchase a book on the case? Give you a better understanding of it.

Me and ILB recommend Wilkes.

I prefer real evidence where available but feel free to speculate with regard to what happened between JB leaving and the TFG entry since it is impossible to know. However we are free to interpret what we can see from the evidence we do have and the crime scene photos.

Please provide a source that JB and June were not on speaking terms during August 1985. Once again you are making unsubstantiated crap claims. Wilkes book is not evidence.

[Adam]

I prefer real evidence where available but feel free to speculate with regard to what happened between JB leaving and the TFG entry since it is impossible to know. However we are free to interpret what we can see from the evidence we do have and the crime scene photos.

Please provide a source that JB and June were not on speaking terms during August 1985. Once again you are making unsubstantiated crap claims. Wilkes book is not evidence.

Try not to be rude. We have different stances.

I have already given you Mary Mugford's court testimony. Ditto Julie.

[Bubo bubo]

Try not to be rude. We have different stances.

I have already given you Mary Mugford's court testimony. Ditto Julie.

You do not have  a stance you have not produced evidence that they were not on speaking terms during the period in question. You are just using statements that were made after the event and related to weeks before the period in question. Where is the evidence that JB and June were not on speaking terms in the weeks leading up to 07/08/85.

[Adam]

You do not have  a stance you have not produced evidence that they were not on speaking terms during the period in question. You are just using statements that were made after the event and related to weeks before the period in question. Where is the evidence that JB and June were not on speaking terms in the weeks leading up to 07/08/85.

They had not spoken for years.

Bamber testified MM's testimony was correct.

[Bubo bubo]

They had not spoken for years.

Bamber testified MM's testimony was correct.

Publish the trial testimony that shows they had not spoken for years and were not on speaking terms in the week before the murders.

[Adam]

Publish the trial testimony that shows they had not spoken for years and were not on speaking terms in the week before the murders.

It is in Wilkes's book. A lot of trial transcript is in it.

[Bubo bubo]

It is in Wilkes's book. A lot of trial transcript is in it.

Ok scan it and post it on the forum.

[Bubo bubo]

They had not spoken for years.

Bamber testified MM's testimony was correct.

Again you are guilty of only quoting part of what was said. You selectively only post the facts that support your thinking so as not to give the real truth of matters. JB and June did fall out but by the time of the murders they were reconciled. Even Steve uk acknowledges this. There is no evidence that were not on speaking terms at the time of the murders

[Adam]

Ok scan it and post it on the forum.

Get the book and read it.

It is a straight forward case. I have no idea why you come up with such crazy theories.

[Adam]

Again you are guilty of only quoting part of what was said. You selectively only post the facts that support your thinking so as not to give the real truth of matters. JB and June did fall out but by the time of the murders they were reconciled. Even Steve uk acknowledges this. There is no evidence that were not on speaking terms at the time of the murders

I am quoting a part of Bamber's testimony.

Bamber thought June was a religious maniac.

[Adam]

As said before, The Sea Wall was excellent evidence he cycled. As it passed no properties or people.

ILB would drive or cycle past properties, people & security cameras. I would be a lot more cautious. 

The police would know not all jurors would believe Bamber would have ILB's approach.

[Bubo bubo]

I am quoting a part of Bamber's testimony.

Bamber thought June was a religious maniac.

That does not prove they were not on speaking terms at the time of the murders.