Confirmation June's bike was stolen.

[Adam]

I do not believe Bamber took June's new bike in July, did a trial run, returned the bike to WHF, then took the bike again on the 5th August 1985.

If he had done that, then the massacre would have gone ahead on Monday 6th August 1985.

[Adam]

The only other reason the massacre would not have gone ahead on Monday 6th August 1985, is if Sheila was not docile enough.

For me it is more likely he did a trial run on the 6th August 1985.

[ILB]

Do you believe Julie rubbished Jeremy's cycle for her claim?

[Adam]

I don't agree June would have reported a stolen bike to the police. How many people do that?

However she may have told non WHF people. Once she noticed it missing.

Therefore it was in his best interests to take the bike as close to the massacre as possible.

The massacre not going ahead on Monday was either because of a trial run, or Sheila was not docile enough.

[ILB]

I don't agree June would have reported a stolen bike to the police. How many people do that?

However she may have told non WHF people. Once she noticed it missing.

Therefore it was in his best interests to take the bike as close to the massacre as possible.

The massacre not going ahead on Monday was either because of a trial run, or Sheila was not docile enough.

Think again we are stifling sensible debate here

Adam is adamant Bamber stole the bike

Without evidence to prove so

[Adam]

Supporters will agree a guilty Bamber would take the bike as close as possible to the massacre.

They just don't accept the COA forensic evidence.

[Adam]

Think it is doubtful Sheila was too alert on Monday night.

Was probably in a similar condition to Tuesday night. Bamber & the housekeeper saying she was non responsive on Tuesday.

Monday night was trial cycle ride night.

[ILB]

Supporters will agree a guilty Bamber would take the bike as close as possible to the massacre.

They just don't accept the COA forensic evidence.

COA is an independent body

[ILB]

Supporters will agree a guilty Bamber would take the bike as close as possible to the massacre.

They just don't accept the COA forensic evidence.

I would like to read DR ismails evidence

[Adam]

Borrowing a bike from June could have been done at any time during the 18 months Bamber and Julie were together.

Snow66! confirmed June had a bike prior to mid July 1985.

[Adam]

Obviously a bike arriving a day before the prosecutions aledged trial and proper bike ride is very suspiscious.

[snow66!]

Obviously a bike arriving a day before the prosecutions aledged trial and proper bike ride is very suspiscious.

Just what exactly was the purpose of a trial run Adam? Julie told the police that JB planned to use the phone with the last number dialled function to secure an alibi,so why would it matter how long it took to get back home? A few minutes back or fore would be of no consequense would it?

[Adam]

Just what exactly was the purpose of a trial run Adam? Julie told the police that JB planned to use the phone with the last number dialled function to secure an alibi,so why would it matter how long it took to get back home? A few minutes back or fore would be of no consequense would it?

Preparation.

[Adam]

Doing a trial run would not take long. He will still get a good nights sleep and be ready for work.

The advantage is once he has cycled to WHF. He has to cycle back.

So is getting good cycling experience of the route. The night before.

[Adam]

A successful trial bike ride will make him more confident.

It is the only thing he can do a dummy run on. Once inside WHF it is a one off.