Non evidence reasons why there is current/former support for Bamber.

[Adam]

From both current and former supporters.

David - Secret stance change attempt to quote 5-10 year old posts of 2 other posters.

Mike/ILB - Met Bamber in prison.

Lookout - Bamber sent her a Christmas card.

JackieD - Julie identified the twins.

Rob - He wouldn't have put the silencer away.

JaneJ - Did not like Julie's court outfit.

Zoso - Letter communication with Bamber.

----------

The common theme here is the support is all for non forensic or circumstantial evidence reasons.

[Adam]

Obviously there needs to be solid evidence undermining the current evidence.

[snow66!]

Obviously there needs to be solid evidence undermining the current evidence.

Aga burns Adam?

[David1819]

From both current and former supporters.

David - Secret stance change attempt to quote 5-10 year old posts of 2 other posters.

Mike/ILD - Met Bamber in prison.

Lookout - Bamber sent her a Christmas card.

JackieD - Julie identified the twins.

Rob - He wouldn't have put the silencer away.

JaneJ - Did not like Julie's court outfit.

Zoso - Letter communication with Bamber.

----------

The common theme here is the support is all for non forensic or circumstantial evidence reasons.

Adam - Thought he was really clever thinking JB was guilty, realises its not so and now trolls the forum out of resentment.

[lookout]

There's every reason to continue supporting JB so far as I'm concerned.

I've lately been mulling over a few things that just don't see him in the picture at all and have given me more of an understanding of Sheila and why she would carry out the murders.