Author Topic: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002  (Read 42575 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #210 on: September 14, 2013, 06:40:PM »
Jeremy never cared about the welfare of the farm so shooting rabbits was out of character. Apparently Nevill and June chided their son for not putting in enough hours at the Farm,the only reason Jeremy not answering back being frightened that June would change her will.
So Steve, you say Jeremy didn't care about the welfare of the farm?

I presume that rabbits eat the crops and impact on the profits made by the farm?

This is surely why farmers shoot rabbits because they affect their livelihood, not because they are in any way dangerous?
As you insist Jeremy Bamber was a greedy person willing to kill the 5 closest relatives he had in the world to get his greedy fingers on the farm profits why would he not care about shooting rabbits and the welfare of the farm?
I would have thought in such a situation he would have seen the rabbits and all other crop eaters as very definitely 'the enemy'??

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #211 on: September 14, 2013, 06:47:PM »

And how VERY unnecessary, unasked for, but immaculately suggestive of her to drop into her statement that some of her friends had registered surprise that Jeremy hadn't asked her for anal sex.

It's a pity EP didn't

a) Look into JM's claims of physical abuse at the hands of her step-father and suffering a brutal anonymous rape in France

and

b) Seek a second opinion from Suzette Ford re JB in general and his relationships with family members.  SF  appeared to be more mature and emotionally stable. 

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #212 on: September 14, 2013, 06:48:PM »

And how VERY unnecessary, unasked for, but immaculately suggestive of her to drop into her statement that some of her friends had registered surprise that Jeremy hadn't asked her for anal sex.

I doubt he'd have to ask!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #213 on: September 14, 2013, 06:50:PM »
..and why waste time loading a full anschutz for rabbits when there were five bullets in there already..

And it doesn't strike you that if he were guilty, he wouldn't have mentioned things like that?

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21083
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #214 on: September 14, 2013, 06:53:PM »
And it doesn't strike you that if he were guilty, he wouldn't have mentioned things like that?
It was his word against nobody's,because all five occupants of the house were slain. I doubt he ever left the rifle on the settle in the first place.

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #215 on: September 14, 2013, 06:54:PM »
It was his word against nobody's,because all five occupants of the house were slain. I doubt he ever left the rifle on the settle in the first place.

He didn't say he left it on the settle, YOU just keep saying he did!!

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #216 on: September 14, 2013, 07:02:PM »
I'll save you from going through the statements again. He said he left it standing in the area where the coats and wellies are kept, it was the magazine he left on the settle!!

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21083
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #217 on: September 14, 2013, 07:03:PM »
He didn't say he left it on the settle, YOU just keep saying he did!!
It makes no difference whether he left it on the settle or by the Wellington boots. You know I think it was the programme about miscarriages which was the trigger:there was Sheila with two healthy children and his three children hadn't been born of Suzette Ford.

A tragic case,but Jeremy is guilty..http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1091.msg33705.html#msg33705

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #218 on: September 14, 2013, 07:08:PM »
Steve, you are turning us all into alcoholics.  8)

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #219 on: September 14, 2013, 07:08:PM »
Steve, you are turning us all into alcoholics.  8)

Lol.............................

Caroline R

  • Guest
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #220 on: September 14, 2013, 07:11:PM »
It makes no difference whether he left it on the settle or by the Wellington boots. You know I think it was the programme about miscarriages which was the trigger:there was Sheila with two healthy children and his three children hadn't been born of Suzette Ford.

A tragic case,but Jeremy is guilty..http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1091.msg33705.html#msg33705

Of course it makes a difference!! DS Miller said he left it on the 'kitchen table' you, that he left it on the settle - when actually, he left it leaning against the wall, beside the coats where no dout at that time, lots of farmers did the same. Now you have decided to change the subject again which is what you always do when you get something wrong!

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #221 on: September 14, 2013, 07:17:PM »
Of course it makes a difference!! DS Miller said he left it on the 'kitchen table' you, that he left it on the settle - when actually, he left it leaning against the wall, beside the coats where no dout at that time, lots of farmers did the same. Now you have decided to change the subject again which is what you always do when you get something wrong!

That´s right. Never fails.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #222 on: September 14, 2013, 07:24:PM »
Jeremy never cared about the welfare of the farm so shooting rabbits was out of character. Apparently Nevill and June chided their son for not putting in enough hours at the Farm,the only reason Jeremy not answering back being frightened that June would change her will.



Is that what Julie told you?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #223 on: September 14, 2013, 07:26:PM »
Steve you do write some poppycock at times and here is me thinking your were intelligent.  Now our April has turned to drink and Susan has given up....well so have I.....having just read the latest episode of "Steve's Multiple Ideas of What Happened at White Farm" as oppose to "Magic Roundabout's Come Back Special"   ::)

I think I will pull a cork out.


Cheers, lovely patti, ENJOY!!!!!

Online Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21083
Re: Alan George Dovey Statement - 20/03/2002
« Reply #224 on: September 14, 2013, 07:30:PM »
I prefer to take Julie's version of events:that it was Jeremy who broached the subject of fostering that night to provoke Sheila,that Sheila may have retaliated in some way verbally and later wrote "I didn't mean to be horrible to Jeremy" in her diary,that Jeremy hired a proxy killer(who was really Jeremy in a balaclava) who made a telephone call from White House to his answerphone at Goldhanger,that Jeremy had lost control of himself somewhat that night and given Nevill more of a thrashing than he intended,but "the old man put up a good fight..".

We know Julie is telling the truth because she relates the bit about a glove coming off in the fight with Nevill,which none of the newspapers reported at the time. Jeremy didn't want a combination of his and Nevill's fingerprints on the murder weapon so they all had to be removed,to be replaced by a solitary fingerprint of Sheila's and a couple of Jeremy's,whereas if Jeremy had been shooting rabbits his fingerprints should have been all over that gun.along with more of Sheila's,who would not have wiped the gun in a state of paranoid psychosis.