Author Topic: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002  (Read 7395 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hartley

  • Guest
Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« on: July 22, 2011, 02:34:PM »
Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002

Offline curiousessex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1418
  • ROCH INDEX 70
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2011, 02:47:PM »
Hartley

Good post.

I have not read this statement before. Makes interesting reading.


Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2011, 02:51:PM »
What do you think was the purpose of her making this statement?

tyler

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2011, 03:13:PM »
Thanks for putting these statements out Hartley.
I never really had an opinion on Julie before.But now I can see for myself that she is an out and out liar!

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2011, 03:18:PM »
One word: BARF!

Muggie sure is good at minimizing her role in this rather serious fraud and wiping her criminal act off on Jeremy, who had absolutely NOTHING to do with this!!

"Jeremy would often tease me about being  a "goody two shoes" and goaded me about how I had never done anything wrong in my life. This led me to being the stronger influence with Susan. Before I met Jeremy I hadn't really done anything wrong. Jeremy did have an influence on me."

"It went in the bin or was given away." How stupid does she think people are?! Only stole things they didn't like! My ass!!
"They may have gone in the Sally Army boxes." BARF and double BARF.

What a load of BS! She sounds like a sociopath, "innocent" little Mugs. Sociopaths are quite good at never owning up to what they've done and very good at wiping their nasty acts off on others around them. I like her even less after reading this statement.
That it is from 2002 just shows that this woman hasn't changed one bit. A mature person would have owned up. She is unbelievable!

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2011, 03:29:PM »
One word: BARF!

Muggie sure is good at minimizing her role in this rather serious fraud and wiping her criminal act off on Jeremy, who had absolutely NOTHING to do with this!!

"Jeremy would often tease me about being  a "goody two shoes" and goaded me about how I had never done anything wrong in my life. This led me to being the stronger influence with Susan. Before I met Jeremy I hadn't really done anything wrong. Jeremy did have an influence on me."

"It went in the bin or was given away." How stupid does she think people are?! Only stole things they didn't like! My ass!!
"They may have gone in the Sally Army boxes." BARF and double BARF.

What a load of BS! She sounds like a sociopath, "innocent" little Mugs. Sociopaths are quite good at never owning up to what they've done and very good at wiping their nasty acts off on others around them. I like her even less after reading this statement.
That it is from 2002 just shows that this woman hasn't changed one bit. A mature person would have owned up. She is unbelievable!
And never really taking the responsibility of their own bad natures. "Before I met Jeremy I hadn't really done anything wrong. Jeremy did have an influence on me." haha.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2011, 03:31:PM »
Strange thing is, the 2002 appeal judges didn't believe the bank manager's account
What did they say about it?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2011, 04:13:PM »
Where are the other 4 pages?

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2011, 04:18:PM »
Where are the other 4 pages?

No idea, this is all I have been able to find. Perhaps Mike may have them.

Offline HMEssex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2011, 06:26:PM »
So JM and Susan Battersby were escorted to the bank by an officer - another lie.

tyler

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2011, 06:32:PM »
So JM and Susan Battersby were escorted to the bank by an officer - another lie.

Exactly.The bank manager gives a totally different version of events.This statement proves to me that she is a liar.

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6670
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2011, 06:38:PM »
So JM and Susan Battersby were escorted to the bank by an officer - another lie.

Exactly.The bank manager gives a totally different version of events.This statement proves to me that she is a liar.

If you add to that the deception about the NoW contract it is clear that the impression that was presented to the jury about this vital witness was very distorted.


tyler

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #12 on: July 22, 2011, 09:54:PM »
Doesnt Julie come across as genuine and believable in her statement.That is until you read the bank managers statement whereby he gives a totally different version of events.And he had nothing at all to gain by lying!I can now see how Julie Mugford managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the jury.To think that the evidence of this blatant liar has seen a man locked up for 26 years.I really do not know how she can sleep at night!

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #13 on: July 22, 2011, 09:58:PM »
Doesnt Julie come across as genuine and believable in her statement.That is until you read the bank managers statement whereby he gives a totally different version of events.And he had nothing at all to gain by lying!I can now see how Julie Mugford managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the jury.To think that the evidence of this blatant liar has seen a man locked up for 26 years.I really do not know how she can sleep at night!

I think she is a sociopath - they sleep just fine, no matter what.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Julie Smerchanski Statement - 12/4/2002
« Reply #14 on: July 22, 2011, 10:36:PM »
So JM and Susan Battersby were escorted to the bank by an officer - another lie.

Exactly.The bank manager gives a totally different version of events.This statement proves to me that she is a liar.

If you add to that the deception about the NoW contract it is clear that the impression that was presented to the jury about this vital witness was very distorted.

Add to that the other inconsistencies in JM's account too: the hit man, the position of Sheila's body, the position of the Bible.

Why do JM's errors in respect of the position of Sheila's body and of the Bible match AE's errors in these respects?