The magic bullets

[Bubo bubo]

OK he was fed by Rivlin. Just like he fed Bews 'a trick of the light'. It does not matter who fed them the results would have been and were the same.

[killingeve]

OK he was fed by Rivlin. Just like he fed Bews 'a trick of the light'. It does not matter who fed them the results would have been and were the same.

And you have the audacity to call me disingenuous.  You are a complete moron.

[Bubo bubo]

There's no expert evidence Nevill was moved. That we are aware of at this time.

The defence pathologist was adamant the marks on Nevill's back were not burns. I have already answered this point see below and the HO pathologist was unsure. No he was not he called them burns at autopsy.
Before Rivlin asks the mystery question he asks PV if they were as he described them as burns. PV replied yes. The problem is that they were different from what he and knight had previously experienced.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11541.msg534706.html#msg534706

[Bubo bubo]

And you have the audacity to call me disingenuous.  You are a complete moron.

I am not engaging in any more of your silly games. I'm putting you on the naughty step with Adam.

[Bubo bubo]

And you have the audacity to call me disingenuous.  You are a complete moron.

The questions were fed irrespective who fed them, which is what I was arguing. They still produced predictable answers. They were the wrong questions to ask. This does not meet the criteria for being disingenuous.

[killingeve]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11541.msg534706.html#msg534706

Why are you altering my posts to give them a different meaning?

[Bubo bubo]

Q When is a door not a door A when its ajar. Q When is a burn not a burn A when everyone says they are except CC.

[killingeve]

Q When is a door not a door A when its ajar. Q When is a burn not a burn A when everyone says they are except CC.

CC and the defence pathologist.

[killingeve]

I am not engaging in any more of your silly games. I'm putting you on the naughty step with Adam.

You're an idiot. 

[killingeve]

It doesn't matter what the pathologist referred to the marks during autopsy.  What counts is how he answered counsel's questions at trial. 

[Bubo bubo]

Why are you altering my posts to give them a different meaning?

Which one? I sometimes crop long posts to answer specific points raised. Please show where this has misrepresented your post.

[Bubo bubo]

CC and the defence pathologist.

Do not keep asking the same question and expect a different answer. It is a sign of madness. How many times must I tell you that they were burns of a type not experienced before and probably since and that is why they were cautious with their answers. PV declared them burns at autopsy because he did not think at that time that the EP would frame JB. He had to be careful in what he said.

[David1819]

Do not keep asking the same question and expect a different answer. It is a sign of madness.

CambridgeAlchie exhibits many signs of madness. 

[killingeve]

Do not keep asking the same question and expect a different answer. It is a sign of madness. How many times must I tell you that they were burns of a type not experienced before and probably since and that is why they were cautious with their answers. PV declared them burns at autopsy because he did not think at that time that the EP would frame JB. He had to be careful in what he said.

Rubbish.  Prof Knight for the defence was adamant the marks were not burns. 

[killingeve]

CambridgeAlchie exhibits many signs of madness. 

Says he who believes AE wrung out SC's menstrual stained knickers inside the silencer.