Vital a plausible Sheila scenario is created.

[Adam]

Mine & CAL's Bamber scenario's are rock solid. As they follow the crime scene evidence.

Appreciate supporters will stay in their comfort zone & dispute the Bamber scenario. Rather than suggest a Sheila scenario.

Saying 'Nevill wouldn't do this' or 'Bamber wouldn't do that is pointless as the evidence shows Nevill & Bamber did do this & that.

After 38 years a plausible Sheila scenario is vital. The crime scene evidence has been available for decades.

The only difference for supporters is they have to include 1/2 phone calls & a build up where a fully fit Nevill & Sheila are engaging with each other prior to any shots being fired.

[snow66!]

Mine & CAL's Bamber scenario's are rock solid. As they follow the crime scene evidence.

Appreciate supporters will stay in their comfort zone & dispute the Bamber scenario. Rather than suggest a Sheila scenario.

Saying 'Nevill wouldn't do this' or 'Bamber wouldn't do that is pointless as the evidence shows Nevill & Bamber did do this & that.

After 38 years a plausible Sheila scenario is vital. The crime scene evidence has been available for decades.

The only difference for supporters is they have to include 1/2 phone calls & a build up where a fully fit Nevill & Sheila are engaging with each other prior to any shots being fired.

I didn't know that CAL had a Bamber scenario Adam.

[David1819]

I didn't know that CAL had a Bamber scenario Adam.

Its almost as bad as Adams

[snow66!]

Its almost as bad as Adams

But as far as I can see she only quotes the official police scenario in her book Dave,not one of her own?

[Roch]

But as far as I can see she only quotes the official police scenario in her book Dave,not one of her own?

Reply 198

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,11554.msg532902.html#msg532902

Though I do recall her proposing some scenario. Was it in the book or was it quite some time after publication, in an interview?  Zoso might know.

[Adam]

I didn't know that CAL had a Bamber scenario Adam.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,6833.msg371011.html#msg371011

[Adam]

I have recently done summaries of David's (5th), Rob's & ILB's Sheila scenarios. They are well aware they are miles away from explaining how Sheila committed the massacre.

Snow66!'s second & Guest29835 versions I have not done yet.

The OS version I have reviewed on here. If you can call it a scenario. 

Mike's & Roch's summaries were only 3 & 9 words. Lookout & Bubo Bubo have always refused to create one.

JaneJ & Zoso did not create one when supporters.

[Adam]

Neither side have been in the situation the 6 people inside WHF were on that night.

There is no point saying he/she would not do that when referring to a Bamber scenario. The crime scene evidence shows that did happen. This scenario is rock solid.

Supporters need to focus on a Sheila scenario. No credible one has been created for 38 years. 

If a credible one is created, then the focus can go onto an industrial frame of the evidence.

[snow66!]

Neither side have been in the situation the 6 people inside WHF were on that night.

There is no point saying he/she would not do that when referring to a Bamber scenario. The crime scene evidence shows that did happen. This scenario is rock solid.

Supporters need to focus on a Sheila scenario. No credible one has been created for 38 years. 

If a credible one is created, then the focus can go onto an industrial frame of the evidence.

If the CCRC accept that Nevill's back was burnt by lying against the Aga,how does this fit in with your rock solid Bamber scenario Adam?

[Adam]

If the CCRC accept that Nevill's back was burnt by lying against the Aga,how does this fit in with your rock solid Bamber scenario Adam?

The CCRC will need confessions from officers that they put Nevill's pyjama top on & then lifted him onto the coal scuttle. Prior to the photos being taken.

Doubtful.

[snow66!]

The CCRC will need confessions from officers that they put Nevill's pyjama top on & then lifted him onto the coal scuttle. Prior to the photos being taken.

Doubtful.

I would imagine that all the CCRC have to do is decide if Boyces finding's about the burn marks are correct and irrefutable,then decide if this evidence points to a guilty Jeremy or a guilty Sheila.

No confession is really needed from the police,the evidence will talk for itself if accepted.

Anyway,lets just imagine for now that Boyces evidence is accepted ,how do you fit this into your JB scenario Adam?

[Adam]

I would imagine that all the CCRC have to do is decide if Boyces finding's about the burn marks are correct and irrefutable,then decide if this evidence points to a guilty Jeremy or a guilty Sheila.

No confession is really needed from the police,the evidence will talk for itself if accepted.

Anyway,lets just imagine for now that Boyces evidence is accepted ,how do you fit this into your JB scenario Adam?

'If'.

[snow66!]

'If'.

Yes,thats what I said Adam.
If.

[Rob_]

Mine & CAL's Bamber scenario's are rock solid. As they follow the crime scene evidence.

Appreciate supporters will stay in their comfort zone & dispute the Bamber scenario. Rather than suggest a Sheila scenario.

Saying 'Nevill wouldn't do this' or 'Bamber wouldn't do that is pointless as the evidence shows Nevill & Bamber did do this & that.

After 38 years a plausible Sheila scenario is vital. The crime scene evidence has been available for decades.

The only difference for supporters is they have to include 1/2 phone calls & a build up where a fully fit Nevill & Sheila are engaging with each other prior to any shots being fired.

Why Adam? the police were happy Sheila committed the tragedy except SJ and he asked the doctor to check JB over when he arrived as SJ thought JB was suffering from shock.

You cannot explain no aspect of the case, so it's l vital you produce a plausible JB scenario!

[Adam]

Why Adam? the police were happy Sheila committed the tragedy except SJ and he asked the doctor to check JB over when he arrived as SJ thought JB was suffering from shock.

You cannot explain no aspect of the case, so it's l vital you produce a plausible JB scenario!

SJ, Bews & Miller. Together with the relatives & Julie. Didn't SJ also have an assistant who agreed with him.

Basically everyone disagreed with Taff. Taff changed stance. Then arrested & interviewed Bamber.