Time breakdown of Sheila's actions after Nevill's final call:

[Adam]

The rest of the things, both supporters & guilters agree happened.

Reloads, bullet & body locations are part of the crime scene.

None of these can be taken away to reduce time.

[ILB]

Saying Sheila did not burn Nevill's back negates 8 minutes.

But then Bamber couldn't have made his 2004-2012 CCRC submission. Where he says - 'Sheila burnt Nevill's back'!

Where do you get your eight minutes from?

[Adam]

Both supporters & guilters agree Nevill did not make any calls at 3.26/3.36am. Fitting 68/88 minutes into 14/24 is a dead duck.

They need to focus on the 3.10am - 3.50am period & decide what of the 7 options Sheila didn't do -

Shower
Change
Dispose of clothes
Paint nails.
Burn Nevill's back
Read bible
Write suicide note

We can then see if everything can be fitted into 40 minutes. Preferably with Sheila not being a navy seal.

[ILB]

Both supporters & guilters agree Nevill did not make any calls at 3.26/3.36am. Fitting 68/88 minutes into 14/24 is a dead duck.

They need to focus on the 3.10am - 3.50am period & decide what of the 7 options Sheila didn't do -

Shower
Change
Dispose of clothes
Paint nails.
Burn Nevill's back
Read bible
Write suicide note

Mate you are talking pure bollocks

[ILB]

This guy is on crack.

[Adam]

Both supporters & guilters agree Nevill did not make any calls at 3.26/3.36am. Fitting 68/88 minutes into 14/24 is a dead duck.

They need to focus on the 3.10am - 3.50am period & decide what of the 7 options Sheila didn't do -

Shower
Change
Dispose of clothes
Paint nails.
Burn Nevill's back
Read bible
Write suicide note

We can then see if everything can be fitted into 40 minutes. Preferably with Sheila not being a navy seal.

Of course deleting any of these will be with gritted teeth. There are huge disadvantages to supporters in admitting Sheila did not do one or all of these.

May be easier to accept Sheila didn't commit the massacre.

[ILB]

https://youtu.be/ju2qr2986P8

[Adam]

Bamber had no time constraints inside WHF. He left when he was ready.

The only time issue he had was the time between calling his AM & calling the police. He needed to 'borrow' June's bike for that.

[ILB]

Bamber had no time constraints inside WHF. He left when he was ready.

The only time issue he had was the time between calling his AM & calling the police. He needed to 'borrow' June's bike for that.

No evidence Jeremy Bamber stole his mother's bike

[Adam]

Supporters need to change stance.

It is proven Sheila could not achieve everything the evidence shows she 'certainly' did together with what the CT suggest she did, in 40 minutes. 

The judge first said this in 1986.

[ILB]

Saying Sheila did not burn Nevill's back negates 8 minutes.

But then Bamber couldn't have made his 2004-2012 CCRC submission. Where he says - 'Sheila burnt Nevill's back'!

Can't take this guy seriously

Evidently close to the investigation. Heavily biased. Hidden agenda.

Surprised his account has lasted almost 11 years.

[Rob_]

Off topic slightly. You have a connection with this case don't you?

I think so to, Adams thoughts and logic are so poisoned and flawed. Perhaps it's time for him to come clean?

Any fair minded person can see there is a problem with this case.

[Adam]

I think so to, Adams thoughts and logic are so poisoned and flawed. Perhaps it's time for him to come clean?

Any fair minded person can see there is a problem with this case.

How do you feel about now being a guilter?

Even you won't try to get 68/88 minutes into 40 & claim Sheila was an ex navy seal.

[ILB]

How do you feel about now being a guilter.

Even you won't try to get 68/88 minutes into 40 & claim Sheila was an ex navy seal.

I know you are connected to this case.

Nobody would spend the amount of time posting spam etc like you do over an almost ten year period

[Adam]

I know you are connected to this case.

Nobody would spend the amount of time posting spam etc like you do over an almost ten year period

How do you feel about now being a guilter?