My view on what time Bamber called his AM.

[ILB]

Least risk & effort cycling. A risk he was prepared to take.

He had to phone the police within a realistic time after phoning his AM from WHF. Impossible without a bike.

Disagree.

What ever way you look at it he had the window of opportunity to do what he did with walking.

If guilty of course

[ILB]

Seems to me the bike scenario was championed.

Regardless of gulit or innocence I do believe he got the bike for the purpose of Julie. Or something mundane.

[Adam]

Disagree.

What ever way you look at it he had the window of opportunity to do what he did with walking.

Why would Bamber spend over 2 hours walking when he could cycle?

The walking & cycling routes would be similar or the same.

As said he had to phone the police within 20 - 30 minutes of phoning his AM. Only possible using June's bike.

[ILB]

Find it interesting in CALS book.

The relatives reference an incident where bamber in a strop got out of the car and proceeded to walk miles home.

Was this is a mundane reason or something to be projected as sinister?

[Adam]

The land between Head Street & WHF looks flat. No hills to cycle up.

With no traffic & good terrain should be able to get quite a speed up.

[Adam]

I will check now. Cannot remember answered six to eight weeks from the time of the massacre. Or from when the September interviews

From the time of the interviews.

[Adam]

AE said she first saw June's bike at Bamber's cottage when visiting a few hours after the massacre.

[Adam]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5816.msg258974.html#msg258974

Page 8. Bamber says the bike arrived at his cottage a week before he committed the massacre.

Sounds about right. Gives him time to do a trial run.

Julie seeing it 3 days before the massacre. AE a few hours afterwards.

[Adam]

Obviously a lot supporting Julie's WS that Bamber said he planned to cycle.

EP & the prosecution certainly  thought so.

The defence that Bamber brought it for Julie to cycle 3 miles to the train station has no credibility.

[ILB]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5816.msg258974.html#msg258974

Page 8. Bamber says the bike arrived at his cottage a week before he committed the massacre.

Sounds about right. Gives him time to do a trial run.

Julie seeing it 3 days before the massacre. AE a few hours afterwards.

It's all purely speculative though isn't it.

You have to admit that

Nothing ties him to doing a bicycle journey

Physically evidential wise

[Rob_]

Why would Bamber spend over 2 hours walking when he could cycle?

The walking & cycling routes would be similar or the same.

As said he had to phone the police within 20 - 30 minutes of phoning his AM. Only possible using June's bike.

Why 2 hours Adam? a person can walk approx. 3 miles an hour faster if jogging.

Stop telling porkies to pretend JB cycling is the only option, though we all know why you persist with this.

[Adam]

Why 2 hours Adam? a person can walk approx. 3 miles an hour faster if jogging.

Stop telling porkies to pretend JB cycling is the only option, though we all know why you persist with this.

Why would Bamber jog there & back when he can cycle?

He stole June's bike just before the massacre for goodness sake.

[ILB]

Why would Bamber jog there & back when he can cycle?

He stole June's bike just before the massacre for goodness sake.

Adam, you have zero proof of this

Why champion a ground you can't prove at all.

[Adam]

Rob is now saying Bamber could jog there and back in the dark. But not cycle in the dark.

Better to focus on an amended Sheila scenario. His only attempt had 56 flaws & relied on 47 invented 'maybe's'. 

[Adam]

Adam, you have zero proof of this

Why champion a ground you can't prove at all.

Did you read Bamber's police interviews?

Bamber, Julie & AE have confirmed he stole June's bike just before the massacre.

He had to cycle to be able to phone the police within 20 - 30 minutes after phoning his AM.