Just for the record though, I'm not anti-Bamber, I'm anti-murderer, if there was a piece of evidence found tomorrow that unquestionably shows him to be innocent then so be it. I appreciate that evidence is lacking for or against, but that's the problem, he needs firm evidence to overturn his conviction even if you think the evidence which convicted him was lacking. Perhaps it's a wider problem with the system.
I still have my view, just like you have yours, I don't really understand the animosity between people on here with opposing views, it's very weird.